McRib
aka HWlaser23, "B" team member
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2009
- Messages
- 15,194
- Reaction score
- 6,286
I would park there because it doesn't say no parking or lines through the parking spot.
Park there.
red zones don't need signage. once a curb is red it's automatically law. my company paint apt complexs for free in hopes of getting tows from them. at no point can anything other than an EMS vehicle be parked against a red curb. doesn't matter if is private or public property.
being in the tow industry I'd NEVER park here.
this stall is definitely a grey area. we could say the same about parking in the first spot next to a handicap spot but law states handicap stalls are very specific. it's about the actual parking space and clearance. parking next to a hydrant in on itself has its own rules as well. hydrants on a city street to have red zones but law states a footage clearance to either side of it.I would disagree with you but you know better then me. I would think as long as they can park behind you and run a hose to the hydrant then they still have access. Also I a handicap spot has to have a sign on the ground and on a poll in front of it. I know private property like malls almost never enforce these laws.
Horrible place for a hydrant. Both stalls next to the hydrant should be red striped at a 45 degree angle, and the red curb should be labeled "no parking fire lane" on both sides.
Community service. Noted.my company paint apt complexs for free in hopes of getting tows from them.
Horrible place for a hydrant. Both stalls next to the hydrant should be red striped at a 45 degree angle, and the red curb should be labeled "no parking fire lane" on both sides.
OCFA vs LACSD...:skull
When plans are submitted to plan check one of the things they look for is a parking ratio vs occupancy load. Sometimes it's very close on how many minimum spots they have to park including handicap stalls. I doubt they gave up these 2 spots plus any other conflicts like this on the plans. My quess is the installer didn't read the surveyors stakes right during installation and nobody fixed it when the parking was done at the end of the job.Well I wouldn't park there & apparently I'm not the only one lol
But damn, that is very confusing for shoppers, no doubt, although we all know that parking in a red zone & blocking a hydrant are both illegal. I wonder why there are no 'no parking' markings in that parking stall? I guess that BMW owner thought it was ok....
When plans are submitted to plan check one of the things they look for is a parking ratio vs occupancy load. Sometimes it's very close on how many minimum spots they have to park including handicap stalls. I doubt they gave up these 2 spots plus any other conflicts like this on the plans. My quess is the installer didn't read the surveyors stakes right during installation and nobody fixed it when the parking was done at the end of the job.
Our UG guy retired a few years back. He was very good at reading the survey stakes. He would also measure from the hydrant to the key valve and write the distance on top of the hydrant. No matter how carefull you are the grader or the asphalt guy would cover up the road box and we would have to go dig it up. :grumble:Possibly. If I was the inspector it would be the plans or the survey that was wrong.
Seriously, I saw all three.:grumble:
Our UG guy retired a few years back. He was very good at reading the survey stakes. He would also measure from the hydrant to the key valve and write the distance on top of the hydrant. No matter how carefull you are the grader or the asphalt guy would cover up the road box and we would have to go dig it up. :grumble:
Have you ever seen a cop with the window down? I haven't they are always running the engine and acPlease tell me there was a window punch involved...
Buena park and norwalk on the same scene, hmmm