WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

Uh Oh Alonzo!!!!

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
40,340
Reaction score
125,092
Congressional sources say Lynch will almost certainly be called to answer Comey's allegations under oath. What did she and Bill Clinton discuss? Did the investigation come up? Why didn't she recuse herself, despite admitting it looked bad? And did she in fact promise the Clinton campaign a whitewash?

Also on the potential witness list are Wasserman Schultz and Amanda Renteria, the senior Clinton campaign staffer with whom Wasserman Schultz claimed Lynch had been in communication.

Lynch privately assured the Clinton campaign she would keep FBI agents in check and wouldn't let their investigation "go too far," according to a message the FBI intercepted involving then-Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz.


www How'sYourMedicineTaste .com
:drink
 

Attachments

  • Loretta+Lynch+iJGZrZ1igIVm.jpg
    Loretta+Lynch+iJGZrZ1igIVm.jpg
    24.2 KB · Views: 21

Old Texan

Honorary Warden #377 Emeritus - R.I.P.
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
24,479
Reaction score
25,978
The big question to me, is who of the group is going to be assigned to be the scapegoat(s) and take the fall?

If these investigations are run correctly to law and handled from a neutral position, the smoke is going to clear and the remnants left by the fire will come to light.

O and HRC through habit cover their skinny and fat asse, so it will be hard to pin them down until the crowd running interference is dealt with accordingly. But we all at heart know how this shit typically goes down. Deals have and will be made behind the scenes. Evidence will be lost. People may even drop dead. And conspiracy claims will be all that is left to banter about in the news and forums......All we will be left with are stains and hate.

We can only hope that somehow things will change and the rats exposed for what they are and how they "sinned". Hope that in reality borders on insanity to think true justice will win.

Which brings up a related question of how the murder investigation in DC is going? An alleged key figure in the email leaks is still dead and no one in MSM has a thing to say.......A fine example of how it goes.:skull
 

Old Texan

Honorary Warden #377 Emeritus - R.I.P.
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
24,479
Reaction score
25,978
Congressional sources say Lynch will almost certainly be called to answer Comey's allegations under oath. What did she and Bill Clinton discuss? Did the investigation come up? Why didn't she recuse herself, despite admitting it looked bad? And did she in fact promise the Clinton campaign a whitewash?

Also on the potential witness list are Wasserman Schultz and Amanda Renteria, the senior Clinton campaign staffer with whom Wasserman Schultz claimed Lynch had been in communication.

Lynch privately assured the Clinton campaign she would keep FBI agents in check and wouldn't let their investigation "go too far," according to a message the FBI intercepted involving then-Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz.


www How'sYourMedicineTaste .com
:drink


Good grief, another set of piano legs on Lynch.:yikes
 

94Nautique

Once Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2010
Messages
12,315
Reaction score
25,628
Congressional sources say Lynch will almost certainly be called to answer Comey's allegations under oath. What did she and Bill Clinton discuss? Did the investigation come up? Why didn't she recuse herself, despite admitting it looked bad? And did she in fact promise the Clinton campaign a whitewash?

Also on the potential witness list are Wasserman Schultz and Amanda Renteria, the senior Clinton campaign staffer with whom Wasserman Schultz claimed Lynch had been in communication.

Lynch privately assured the Clinton campaign she would keep FBI agents in check and wouldn't let their investigation "go too far," according to a message the FBI intercepted involving then-Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz.


www How'sYourMedicineTaste .com
:drink
Ugh, that is one, thick, lineman. But I'll bet the libs still think she's hot.
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
40,340
Reaction score
125,092
Ugh, that is one, thick, lineman. But I'll bet the libs still think she's hot.

She should have stuck with the bolts, that woman could block!
 

Attachments

  • Lorenzo Neal.jpg
    Lorenzo Neal.jpg
    60.4 KB · Views: 23

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
40,340
Reaction score
125,092
:drnkfr

The Senate committee has launched a formal investigation into Lynch's attempts to shape the FBI's probe into Hillary Clinton, and whether she mishandled classified information on her private email server.

“Sen. Charles E. Grassley, chairman of the committee, said the investigation is bipartisan. The letter to Ms. Lynch is signed by ranking Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein and also by Sens. Lindsey Graham and Sheldon Whitehouse, the chairman and ranking member of the key investigative subcommittee.”



“Letters also went to Clinton campaign staffer Amanda Renteria and Leonard Benardo and Gail Scovell at the Open Society Foundations. Mr. Benardo was reportedly on an email chain from the then-head of the Democratic National Committee suggesting Ms. Lynch had given assurances to Ms. Renteria, the campaign staffer, that the Clinton probe wouldn’t “go too far."


www ThankYouMayIHaveAnother .com
:drink
 

94Nautique

Once Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2010
Messages
12,315
Reaction score
25,628
:drnkfr

The Senate committee has launched a formal investigation into Lynch's attempts to shape the FBI's probe into Hillary Clinton, and whether she mishandled classified information on her private email server.

?Sen. Charles E. Grassley, chairman of the committee, said the investigation is bipartisan. The letter to Ms. Lynch is signed by ranking Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein and also by Sens. Lindsey Graham and Sheldon Whitehouse, the chairman and ranking member of the key investigative subcommittee.?



?Letters also went to Clinton campaign staffer Amanda Renteria and Leonard Benardo and Gail Scovell at the Open Society Foundations. Mr. Benardo was reportedly on an email chain from the then-head of the Democratic National Committee suggesting Ms. Lynch had given assurances to Ms. Renteria, the campaign staffer, that the Clinton probe wouldn?t ?go too far."


www ThankYouMayIHaveAnother .com
:drink
Dare to dream that anything will come of this.
 

KevinR

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
2,591
Reaction score
4,307
"We can only hope that somehow things will change and the rats exposed for what they are and how they "sinned". Hope that in reality borders on insanity to think true justice will win."

God almighty I hope so. Just once.
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
40,340
Reaction score
125,092
When former Attorney General Loretta Lynch testified last year about her decision not to prosecute Hillary Clinton for mishandling classified information, she swore she never talked to “anyone” on the Clinton campaign. That categorical denial, though made in response to a series of questions about whether she spoke with Clintonworld about remaining attorney general if Hillary won the election, could come back to haunt her.

The Senate Judiciary Committee, which has launched a bipartisan investigation into Lynch for possible obstruction of justice, recently learned of the existence of a document indicating Lynch assured the political director of Clinton’s campaign she wouldn’t let FBI agents “go too far” in probing the former secretary of state.

Lynch’s lawyer says she is cooperating with committee investigators, who are seeking answers to several questions, as well as relevant documents. Among other things, they want to know if she or any of her Justice Department staff “ever communicated with Amanda Renteria,” who headed Clinton’s political operations during the campaign. Renteria, who has been identified in the document as the senior Clinton campaign aide with whom Lynch privately communicated, has also been asked to testify.

www ScandalFreeAdministration .com :point
 

Old Texan

Honorary Warden #377 Emeritus - R.I.P.
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
24,479
Reaction score
25,978
When former Attorney General Loretta Lynch testified last year about her decision not to prosecute Hillary Clinton for mishandling classified information, she swore she never talked to ?anyone? on the Clinton campaign. That categorical denial, though made in response to a series of questions about whether she spoke with Clintonworld about remaining attorney general if Hillary won the election, could come back to haunt her.

The Senate Judiciary Committee, which has launched a bipartisan investigation into Lynch for possible obstruction of justice, recently learned of the existence of a document indicating Lynch assured the political director of Clinton?s campaign she wouldn?t let FBI agents ?go too far? in probing the former secretary of state.

Lynch?s lawyer says she is cooperating with committee investigators, who are seeking answers to several questions, as well as relevant documents. Among other things, they want to know if she or any of her Justice Department staff ?ever communicated with Amanda Renteria,? who headed Clinton?s political operations during the campaign. Renteria, who has been identified in the document as the senior Clinton campaign aide with whom Lynch privately communicated, has also been asked to testify.

www ScandalFreeAdministration .com :point

And yet the detractors focus on Trump.....:rolleyes

Lynch and her predecessor, Holder are covered up in questionable actions while holding office. Lynch meeting Slick Willie was open and public news and of itself just on timing deserves investigation. Blather about O being gone and HRC losing do not relieve them or thior minions from being called to task on their dirty illegal actions.

Lynch is quite obvious in her actions to squash the Clinton investigation, yet liberal focus is on Trump and Putin nonsense.:rolleyes:grumble:
 
Top