500bbc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2007
- Messages
- 26,516
- Reaction score
- 40,447
I'm puzzled the Tard chorus has crowed loudly, consistently, non stop " Accusation GUILTY!, Investigation GUILTY"!
How did this slip through the cracks, must be corruption and lack of forged evidence.
Better luck next time turd licking Tards!
Devin Nunes vindicated
http://www.americanthinker.com
By Monica Showalter
December 8, 2017
The House Ethics Committee has cleared Rep. Devin Nunes of the scurrilous charge that he disclosed classified information.
In the course of this investigation, the Committee sought the analysis of Representative Nunes’s statements by classification experts in the intelligence community. Based solely on the conclusion of these classification experts that the information that Representative Nunes disclosed was not classified, the Committee will take no further action and considers this matter closed.
So there was nothing there all along. And the howls from Democrats, suddenly concerned about protecting classified information after years of coddling traitors such as Ed Snowden, now stand as what they were - efforts to shut down a congressional investigation into Russian collusion which it turns out, has been largely on the left. It was nothing but partisanship that motivated this complaint on one of our finest congressmen.
Because anyone who knows Nunes knows he's hard-nosed almost to a fault on Russians. If something were going on between anyone and the Russians, he'd come down hard on any collaborators, no matter who they were.
But in the case of this investigation, the aim was explicitly partisan. Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff made a big deal about ethics when Nunes got information from the White House about surveillance and he wasn't the first to hear about it. Suddenly, he was concerned about classified information, something that didn't bother him when news came out about Hillary Clinton's illegal private server and her aide, Huma Abedin's emailing of classified documents onto Anthony Weiner's computer. None of this was an issue, but Nunes hearing something Schiff didn't hear first was a problem. Can you say 'ego'?
How did this slip through the cracks, must be corruption and lack of forged evidence.
Better luck next time turd licking Tards!
Devin Nunes vindicated
http://www.americanthinker.com
By Monica Showalter
December 8, 2017
The House Ethics Committee has cleared Rep. Devin Nunes of the scurrilous charge that he disclosed classified information.
In the course of this investigation, the Committee sought the analysis of Representative Nunes’s statements by classification experts in the intelligence community. Based solely on the conclusion of these classification experts that the information that Representative Nunes disclosed was not classified, the Committee will take no further action and considers this matter closed.
So there was nothing there all along. And the howls from Democrats, suddenly concerned about protecting classified information after years of coddling traitors such as Ed Snowden, now stand as what they were - efforts to shut down a congressional investigation into Russian collusion which it turns out, has been largely on the left. It was nothing but partisanship that motivated this complaint on one of our finest congressmen.
Because anyone who knows Nunes knows he's hard-nosed almost to a fault on Russians. If something were going on between anyone and the Russians, he'd come down hard on any collaborators, no matter who they were.
But in the case of this investigation, the aim was explicitly partisan. Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff made a big deal about ethics when Nunes got information from the White House about surveillance and he wasn't the first to hear about it. Suddenly, he was concerned about classified information, something that didn't bother him when news came out about Hillary Clinton's illegal private server and her aide, Huma Abedin's emailing of classified documents onto Anthony Weiner's computer. None of this was an issue, but Nunes hearing something Schiff didn't hear first was a problem. Can you say 'ego'?
