WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

What is wrong with CA judges

liquid addiction

^ 78 DiMarco Flat
Joined
Feb 3, 2016
Messages
1,232
Reaction score
2,721
Really?


A California appeals court ruled this week inmates can legally possess marijuana in prison – they just can't do anything with it.

The 3rd District Court of Appeal’s 20-page ruling says the state’s voters legalized recreational possession of less than an ounce of cannabis in 2016, with no exception -- even for those behind bars. The decision Tuesday overturned the Sacramento County convictions of five inmates who'd been found with marijuana in their prison cells.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/california-inmates-can-possess-marijuana
 
  • Like
Reactions: DWC

EBT531

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2018
Messages
689
Reaction score
634
So does "do nothing with it" cover storing it in your *ss?? Isnt that one of the new ways to do Weed? Seems like a violation of their prison storage system rights LOL
 

Danger Dave

Sarcastically Optimistic 😁
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
14,348
Reaction score
39,360
Let them smoke as much weed as possible. It will cut down on jail violence. They will be too stoned to want to fight.

Plus they will need to work harder to earn more canteen money to buy snacks. CA is full of good ideas.
 

dribble

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
3,724
Reaction score
5,916
There's nothing wrong with California Judges (at least not in this case). They don't pass laws. With the passage of prop 64, possession of small amounts of marijuana is now legal in CA (and other states). What the press in this case failed to mention is that the prison can still ban marijuana within their administrative rule framework. What they can no longer do is charge the inmate with a felony unless and until the legislature acts. This ruling as I read it, follows the current but flawed law.
 
Last edited:

SKIDMARC

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2011
Messages
3,378
Reaction score
3,662
I guess if you cant stop it, allow it.
 

Kfabe

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2013
Messages
564
Reaction score
1,591
Really?


A California appeals court ruled this week inmates can legally possess marijuana in prison – they just can't do anything with it.

The 3rd District Court of Appeal’s 20-page ruling says the state’s voters legalized recreational possession of less than an ounce of cannabis in 2016, with no exception -- even for those behind bars. The decision Tuesday overturned the Sacramento County convictions of five inmates who'd been found with marijuana in their prison cells.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/california-inmates-can-possess-marijuana

HONK! HONK!
 

500bbc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
26,384
Reaction score
40,051
Really?


A California appeals court ruled this week inmates can legally possess marijuana in prison – they just can't do anything with it.

The 3rd District Court of Appeal’s 20-page ruling says the state’s voters legalized recreational possession of less than an ounce of cannabis in 2016, with no exception -- even for those behind bars. The decision Tuesday overturned the Sacramento County convictions of five inmates who'd been found with marijuana in their prison cells.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/california-inmates-can-possess-marijuana
So he's saying they're required to keep it where it is, in their rectums?:eek:
 

Andy B.

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
5,320
Reaction score
7,230
There's nothing wrong with California Judges (at least not in this case). They don't pass laws. With the passage of prop 64, possession of small amounts of marijuana is now legal in CA (and other states). What the press in this case failed to mention is that the prison can still ban marijuana within their administrative rule framework, what they can no longer do is charge the inmate with a felony unless and until the legislature acts. This ruling as I read it, follows the current but flawed law.

The fuckers are in jail for a reason they lost all there rights when they commit a crime the next thing you'll want them to have is the ability to order out WTF!! Ca what a backwards ass state I feel for the normal common sense people that live there. They're felons they should be in a tent and shackles fuck them and there rights it's their choice to rob,kill.rape,etc they made the choice!!!! Seems to me the proposition was meant or should have been for HONEST CITIZENS NOT CRIMINALS this isn't public property it's jail!!
 
Last edited:

500bbc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
26,384
Reaction score
40,051
They are making judgements based upon their opinion rather than following the law. Should be a terminating offense.
They are making judgments to intentionally make life so miserable for normal people that they will give up more of their rights to be rescued by their Libturd masters.
 

dribble

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
3,724
Reaction score
5,916
The fuckers are in jail for a reason they lost all there rights when they commit a crime the next thing you'll want them to have is the ability to order out WTF!! Ca what a backwards ass state I feel for the normal common sense people that live there. They're felons they should be in a tent and shackles fuck them and there rights it's their choice to rob,kill.rape,etc they made the choice!!!! Seems to me the proposition was meant or should have been for HONEST CITIZENS NOT CRIMINALS this isn't public property it's jail!!

You seem have no comprehension of my post. I'm not arguing what they do or don't deserve. When the referendum regarding marijuana possession was written , then passed by the voters, there was no exclusion for prisoners. Clearly this was an oversight. It is now up to the legislature to correct that. The jails / prisons still ban marijuana possession. They just can't charge the inmate caught with it criminally. They can confiscate the drug and apply administrative penalties or even deny parole based on not following the rules. Much like they do when they catch prisoners with liquor. The judges can only rule based on the laws that are in effect. The legislature failed to act on this and they are to blame. With this ruling, they can and likely will act now.
 

t&y

t&y
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
15,692
Reaction score
27,527
You seem have no comprehension of my post. I'm not arguing what they do or don't deserve. When the referendum regarding marijuana possession was written , then passed by the voters, there was no exclusion for prisoners. Clearly this was an oversight. It is now up to the legislature to correct that. The jails / prisons still ban marijuana possession. They just can't charge the inmate caught with it criminally. They can confiscate the drug and apply administrative penalties or even deny parole based on not following the rules. Much like they do when they catch prisoners with liquor. The judges can only rule based on the laws that are in effect. The legislature failed to act on this and they are to blame. With this ruling, they can and likely will act now.
On a technicality your are correct. But here is a bigger problem, and the same problem I have with douche bag assholes that like to roll around smoking that shit in public. If these oxygen thieves are smoking the ciga shit in the facility, they are effecting the prison staff. Now that staff goes for a piss test and gets disciplined or fired from the second hand smoke. Many of these facilities are just big concrete boxes that really don't ventilate all that well. When they used to actually allow tobacco there was a low hanging cloud in many of those facilities as soon as you walked in.

People don't accidentally bring dope into a jail facility. It should still be considered a felony, and honestly double any time they already have.

California is Fucked...
 

dribble

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
3,724
Reaction score
5,916
On a technicality your are correct. But here is a bigger problem, and the same problem I have with douche bag assholes that like to roll around smoking that shit in public. If these oxygen thieves are smoking the ciga shit in the facility, they are effecting the prison staff. Now that staff goes for a piss test and gets disciplined or fired from the second hand smoke. Many of these facilities are just big concrete boxes that really don't ventilate all that well. When they used to actually allow tobacco there was a low hanging cloud in many of those facilities as soon as you walked in.

People don't accidentally bring dope into a jail facility. It should still be considered a felony, and honestly double any time they already have.

California is Fucked...

They still won’t be able to smoke it. That’s my point. It’s still a violation of prison rules. The guards can confiscate and the prisoner can face administrative discipline such as a loss of privileges, solitary confinement, whatever. The courts have to rule on law. Not rule on how we (or even they) feel. Much like I can get a DUI dismissed on a technicality but DMV can still suspend my license and add points to my driving record. Even our ultra liberal Attorney General fought this. Until the legislature acts, this ruling was legally correct.
 

liquid addiction

^ 78 DiMarco Flat
Joined
Feb 3, 2016
Messages
1,232
Reaction score
2,721
That is my point to the whole thing. I could care less if they smoke it or shove it up their asses. But How can it be ruled you can have it but you can’t do anything with it. Who comes up with this shit?
 

t&y

t&y
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
15,692
Reaction score
27,527
That is my point to the whole thing. I could care less if they smoke it or shove it up their asses. But How can it be ruled you can have it but you can’t do anything with it. Who comes up with this shit?
The retards running this state. And that concludes class for the day kids:D
 

Andy B.

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
5,320
Reaction score
7,230
You seem have no comprehension of my post. I'm not arguing what they do or don't deserve. When the referendum regarding marijuana possession was written , then passed by the voters, there was no exclusion for prisoners. Clearly this was an oversight. It is now up to the legislature to correct that. The jails / prisons still ban marijuana possession. They just can't charge the inmate caught with it criminally. They can confiscate the drug and apply administrative penalties or even deny parole based on not following the rules. Much like they do when they catch prisoners with liquor. The judges can only rule based on the laws that are in effect. The legislature failed to act on this and they are to blame. With this ruling, they can and likely will act now.

I did I said the proposition and law should apply only to law abiding citizens not criminals in jail because to me they are not citizens anymore. I get it I he ruled to the letter of the law but they're not citizens anymore in my eyes!! My comprehension is fine I guess I should have explained myself better I was ranting though so I got a little excited.
 

dribble

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
3,724
Reaction score
5,916
I did I said the proposition and law should apply only to law abiding citizens not criminals in jail because to me they are not citizens anymore. I get it I he ruled to the letter of the law but they're not citizens anymore in my eyes!! My comprehension is fine I guess I should have explained myself better I was ranting though so I got a little excited.
Remember this is a state that is trying to give parolees the right to vote. Technically parolees are still prisoners. On a side note 14 other states already let them vote.
 
Top