YumaRivernaut
How Far Off Was I?
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2019
- Messages
- 5,022
- Reaction score
- 7,919
Censored for a buck.
Last edited:
snip' Sandy Hoaxters. snip' It takes some seriously sick fucks to make mind programming like this and a sick ass media to put it out there.
Kill your TV.
It takes a seriously sick fuck to even hint that Sandy Hook was a hoax...
If you actually belive this crawl back into your hole and don't bother coming back out.
Yuma, I have a couple of people on ignore, so if you are responding to them, I have no idea what they have said... Even the quoted posts don't show to me, it's great...Looking at your last reply I see no way it is directed to me, right???. I don't want you to think I'm ignoring you...
Ray
What sort of connection do you have with Sandy Hook?
Connection ??? How about being a human who doesn't think kids should be shot in their class rooms.
Honest to phuch WTG, do you really want to align yourself with people who claim Sandy Hook didn't happen?
Oh it happened, and it the left is totally ok with propagandizing every occurence, even though they are partially to blame (way more so than the NRA ever would be).Connection ??? How about being a human who doesn't think kids should be shot in their class rooms.
Honest to phuch WTG, do you really want to align yourself with people who claim Sandy Hook didn't happen?
The only “humans” that want kids shot in classrooms are the “inhumans” that do it.
and there was NO defense. how is that humane? Put the kids in a place where they are sitting targets??????Chicken shit answer...
Kids died at Sandy Hook School December 14, 2012? Yes or No
Chicken shit answer...
Kids died at Sandy Hook School December 14, 2012? Yes or No
Oh it happened, and it the left is totally ok with propagandizing every occurence, even though they are partially to blame (way more so than the NRA ever would be).
Yet, you think putting targets on schools making them a "gun free zone" is a good idea. How about we protect our most valuable assets, our kids, like we do our money. Big, scary, black guns being held by big scary people in clearly marked defense uniforms.
Not to scare the kids, but to scare the freaks that want to make a name for themselves by shooting innocent kids. But hey, that would mean no more human shields in order to take the guns away from the good guys.
To put it into perspective, there are more killing machines in EVERY school parking lot and in every students hands. Cars and phones kill more kids. Thats a fact. So are you cool with banning phones and cars?
Logic and truth, the total total buzz kill for lefties.
I wasn’t there, were you?
Are you angry because I wont agree with you?
I haven’t answered either way, yet your priority seems to be that I MUST agree with you.
Hmmm...I see a pattern here.
I don't need you to agree with me... I need you to not treat those kids and their families like the punchline to an Alex Jones fueled joke.
Are you unable to understand the meaning of the term "shall not infringe" or are you unwilling?There is merit in debating the cause, effect, and possible solution path to the gun violence problem in this country. There is NO room to give people who claim Sandy Hook (for instance) didn't happen a voice. This is the lowest intellectual position one can take and everyone owes it to those kids and their families to stand up and say that.
I 100% agree with your cars are like guns point.
With your idea held high: Lets license every gun owner and register every gun. Lets train and test to a minimum standard of competency before you can get that license. Lets demand insurance to operate. Lets hold manufactures liable for damage. Lets demand technology innovations be incorporated that make accidents less likely. Lets treat guns exactly like we treat cars...
And when autonomous cars take over, THEY WILL COME FOR YOUR CARS. And they will take your freedom of movement with it. Thank you for proving my point on why universal background and gun registry only works for fascist gun grabbers.There is merit in debating the cause, effect, and possible solution path to the gun violence problem in this country. There is NO room to give people who claim Sandy Hook (for instance) didn't happen a voice. This is the lowest intellectual position one can take and everyone owes it to those kids and their families to stand up and say that.
I 100% agree with your cars are like guns point.
With your idea held high: Lets license every gun owner and register every gun. Lets train and test to a minimum standard of competency before you can get that license. Lets demand insurance to operate. Lets hold manufactures liable for damage. Lets demand technology innovations be incorporated that make accidents less likely. Lets treat guns exactly like we treat cars...
Are you unable to understand the meaning of the term "shall not infringe" or are you unwilling?
I 100% agree with your cars are like guns point.
With your idea held high: Lets license every gun owner and register every gun. Lets train and test to a minimum standard of competency before you can get that license. Lets demand insurance to operate. Lets hold manufactures liable for damage. Lets demand technology innovations be incorporated that make accidents less likely. Lets treat guns exactly like we treat cars...
Chicken shit answer...
Kids died at Sandy Hook School December 14, 2012? Yes or No
LMFAO. You realize 2a was written to make sure people like you, those willing to twist the meaning of words in order to make some silly point or to vapidly control a population, are unable to do so. To put it in plain, uncluttered English, 2a means to have a well armed population so that the government is by the people and for the people.Are you unable to understand the meaning of the term "Well Regulated" or are you unwilling?
Are you unable to understand the meaning of the term "Well Regulated" or are you unwilling?
I understand "Well Regulated" to you means different to me..."being necessary to the security of a free State" soooooooooo..................................
Are you unable to understand the meaning of the term "Well Regulated" or are you unwilling?
here you go (it's not what most people think): from https://www.constitution.org/cons/wellregu.htm
The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.
I don't watch TV but my some of my friends that do told me about this. This commercial is funded by he Sandy Hoaxters. Straight up anti gun propaganda. Sick psychopaths scaring the shit out of kids and parents like this is reprehensible. Skateboards, socks, phones and sneakers wont stop a shooter. A lead infusion by a security guard or an armed teacher would though. Subtle mind programming: You will always live in fear. You are helpless. You can not and will not fight back (certainly not with guns). And perhaps the most subtle and nefarious message, There WILL be more shootings. I guess they are privy to some kind of future knowledge?
It takes some seriously sick fucks to make mind programming like this and a sick ass media to put it out there.
Kill your TV.
Are you unable to see the comma? Or are you unwilling.Are you unable to understand the meaning of the term "Well Regulated" or are you unwilling?
I"m sure the man can answer for himself.Interesting perspective. While I am not familiar with the group that published that video, I am familiar with the context of its subject matter. NO I was not there, but YES I have read quite a bit of info on Sandy Hook. I don't need to say I was there to know it happened, just like I didn't need to be at Parkland or the concert in Vegas to know they happened.
As to the content, what about it do you not agree with? Or is it just the source?
I agree, the best defense in a gun fight is returning fire.
You view it as living in fear, I view it as starting a conversation about the reality of the world we live in. ABSOFUCKINGLOOTLY there will be another school shooting, just like there have been since Sandy Hook. Why not open that discussion (age appropriate audience of course) now and start preparing for it. You are actually projecting your view on life here which is kind of funny, because it appears you are actually trying to blame someone else for the same. You seem to see kids taking action as fear mongering. I see that as a way to give examples of exactly what to do if you are stuck in the next one.
They give examples of RUN, HIDE, and or FIGHT, which is pretty much spot on to what is taught to ALL audiences in regards to mass shootings. If you wanna get real technical about it, civilians are taught those concepts as a means to escape the threat, where police or other means of security, are trained in those concepts as a means of running towards the gun fire, hiding by using cover of concealment if possible, while returning gun fire, to stop the threat.
I'm not sure why you seem so upset here.
As I said above, protect our most valuable assets, our kids, but no the fuckturds came up with gun free zones. And thwy call themselves the party of science AND say they have a heart.Interesting that we place armed guards in banks to protect our money.......and no one complains.....
It is a shame we do not value our children in the same manner...........
BTW....when it comes to values.......Does the Left favor aborting money from existence too,..... or just the children they now pretend to be saving?
I"m sure the man can answer for himself.
My take is the left just wants to tie everyone's hands behind their backs in a self defense situation. I'm having none of that and if at some point it makes me a criminal. So be it.
Gun free zones are like fly traps vs. a fly swatter.
......but no the fuckturds came up with gun free zones.
Perhaps would should replace all bank Security Guards with " Gun Free Zone" signs ......
I'm thinking all elected representative just wear a shirt with the gun free zone sign?Perhaps would should replace all bank Security Guards with " Gun Free Zone" signs ......
Would that look like this?Perhaps would should replace all bank Security Guards with " Gun Free Zone" signs ......
Would that look like this?
uh, the reality is who is likely educating most of the kids, most of the time. lefties, and their "reality" is nothing like ours, or the real world for that matter. (gun free zones, are real in what reality? just like prisons are drug free zones and we all know how real that reality is...)I take it as the left are a bunch of idiots that truly don't understand what self defense means. I'm not advocating for disarming people or supporting gun free zones. I just don't see all the uproar over educating kids as to the reality's of the world.
It's all about the context of the delivery, and I really don't see that video as bad. It is produced in a manner that kids will pay attention. I think it's far more about using that video as part of a presentation with actual discussion about self defense and all the other steps that can be taken. I actually commend them for showing trauma care in there, most videos don't.
I think what we want is parents teaching the reality of everyday life, and being present, and not letting the educators indoctrinate.
I agree. That is why I talk about this stuff with my kids on the regular. Anybody that lets the schools be their kids soul source of education is an idiot.uh, the reality is who is likely educating most of the kids, most of the time. lefties, and their "reality" is nothing like ours, or the real world for that matter. (gun free zones, are real in what reality? just like prisons are drug free zones and we all know how real that reality is...)
I think what we want is parents teaching the reality of everyday life, and being present, and not letting the educators indoctrinate.
I agree. That is why I talk about this stuff with my kids on the regular. Anybody that lets the schools and/or churches be their kids sole source of education is an idiot.
Thanks Squeezer. What a fucked up world we live in where the right won’t even honor the memory of child victims because they see it as a threat to their precious toys. Does anybody really think that was what the Founding Fathers intended?I don't need you to agree with me... I need you to not treat those kids and their families like the punchline to an Alex Jones fueled joke.
Men, Women and Children gave up their lives and everything they owned so you could post that what they did as inconsequential.Thanks Squeezer. What a fucked up world we live in where the right won’t even honor the memory of child victims because they see it as a threat to their precious toys. Does anybody really think that was what the Founding Fathers intended?
I agree. That is why I talk about this stuff with my kids on the regular. Anybody that lets the schools be their kids soul source of education is an idiot.
you and your ilk put kids into "gun free" zones, and then when a crazy person kills them you happily parade the victims around as a reason why guns kill. You are sick, twisted, and lack any moral reasoning abilities. you are the fucked up person, invading our world. you dont think. you just shit on the world, you are a fraud.Thanks Squeezer. What a fucked up world we live in where the right won’t even honor the memory of child victims because they see it as a threat to their precious toys. Does anybody really think that was what the Founding Fathers intended?