WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

Supreme Court - House Requests for Trump tax returns on indefinite hold.

SBMech

Fixes Broken Stuff
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
11,627
Reaction score
20,783
Guess what, Reg? Sooner or later Trump will no longer be President but Washington will always be Washington and your anarchist fantasies are just pathetic delusions. To paraphrase Jimmy Dale Gilmour, Trump is just a wave he’s not the water.

This right here is why most of us would love to drag you down the middle of the street and beat your ass across the border to the fantasy land you live in.

You truly believe that the government should be allowed to act as they are now, with endless untouchable authority over it's citizens, when they have been proven to not even believe that they are supposed to be working on OUR BEST INTERESTS, not acting out and RULING like ROYALTY over us.

You don't fucking get it do you? 100 years of corruption is about to drag us under, forever ending the America my parents, grand parents, great grand parents, great great great grandparents came to help bring rise to the greatest nation on this planet. They fought world wars, bled and died for this amazing country we are blessed to have been born in.

You truly believe that your way of thinking is the only correct way to "progress" as a society.

You are insane, driven to believe lies fabricated daily by the grotesque media determined to keep it's curtain drawn over the public's view of the world.

News flash, the ideals this country was founded on, and most of us were raised on, are what makes this country what it is.

Throwing them away to let men use womens restrooms by allowing anyone to pick an "identity", this weird fetish media seems to have over LBGTLMNOPQ whatever the fuck stuffing it down the throats of anyone who watches the deadbrain box, rampant lies proven over and over by "news shows", "newspapers" Time fagazine etc...

It's like 10% of the nation has lost it's fucking mind.

And here you are, leading the charge.

You honestly have no fucking clue as to what is going to happen when enough of us have had enough. You know not what you ask for.

Fuck yes we need it though, "Washington will still be Washington" is the exact reason we need a big dick swinging asshole like President Trump right now to tear that shit down. He will not be able to, anyone with half a brain knows, but exposing the utterly corrupt government so maybe the rest of us can works for me.

Better than wishing things would change, because letting twats like yourself get in charge is a disaster, just look at CA as an example.
 

spectras only

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
13,091
Reaction score
12,874

rrrr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
15,097
Reaction score
32,946
Trump hasn’t been indicted over the whole Russia thing for one very simple reason- DOJ policy (not law) which says you can’t indict a sitting President.

That's bullshit. The AG has specifically stated that there is no evidence supporting a criminal charge in the Mueller report, and that the policy you mention is not the reason Trump was not charged with a crime.
 
Last edited:

RVR SWPR

Almost Off the Grid
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
9,420
Reaction score
13,015
You guys need ask why this GMAC Caricature Checks in here everyday and takes abuse on literally every possible subject or issue.For sure entertaining, but after 3 years of total negative input you gotta wonder why,what is the end game?
 

Grandpa mac

Now politics is kinda boring ;)
Joined
May 20, 2016
Messages
5,249
Reaction score
978
This right here is why most of us would love to drag you down the middle of the street and beat your ass across the border to the fantasy land you live in.

You truly believe that the government should be allowed to act as they are now, with endless untouchable authority over it's citizens, when they have been proven to not even believe that they are supposed to be working on OUR BEST INTERESTS, not acting out and RULING like ROYALTY over us.

You don't fucking get it do you? 100 years of corruption is about to drag us under, forever ending the America my parents, grand parents, great grand parents, great great great grandparents came to help bring rise to the greatest nation on this planet. They fought world wars, bled and died for this amazing country we are blessed to have been born in.

You truly believe that your way of thinking is the only correct way to "progress" as a society.

You are insane, driven to believe lies fabricated daily by the grotesque media determined to keep it's curtain drawn over the public's view of the world.

News flash, the ideals this country was founded on, and most of us were raised on, are what makes this country what it is.

Throwing them away to let men use womens restrooms by allowing anyone to pick an "identity", this weird fetish media seems to have over LBGTLMNOPQ whatever the fuck stuffing it down the throats of anyone who watches the deadbrain box, rampant lies proven over and over by "news shows", "newspapers" Time fagazine etc...

It's like 10% of the nation has lost it's fucking mind.

And here you are, leading the charge.

You honestly have no fucking clue as to what is going to happen when enough of us have had enough. You know not what you ask for.

Fuck yes we need it though, "Washington will still be Washington" is the exact reason we need a big dick swinging asshole like President Trump right now to tear that shit down. He will not be able to, anyone with half a brain knows, but exposing the utterly corrupt government so maybe the rest of us can works for me.

Better than wishing things would change, because letting twats like yourself get in charge is a disaster, just look at CA as an example.
You're so silly.
 

Grandpa mac

Now politics is kinda boring ;)
Joined
May 20, 2016
Messages
5,249
Reaction score
978
That's bullshit. The AG has specifically stated that there is no evidence supporting a criminal charge in the Mueller report, and that the policy you mention is not the reason Trump was not charged with a crime.
And the guy who wrote the fucking report very specifically DID NOT say that there was no evidence to support an indictment. In fact he spoke about said DOJ policy prohibiting an indictment and then mentioned that there is a Constitutional remedy (i.e. Impeachment).
 

t&y

t&y
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
15,715
Reaction score
27,675
And the guy who wrote the fucking report very specifically DID NOT say that there was no evidence to support an indictment. In fact he spoke about said DOJ policy prohibiting an indictment and then mentioned that there is a Constitutional remedy (i.e. Impeachment).
Finally some clarity here. So using the Libturd logic for criminal proceedings, because he DID NOT say there was "no evidence", that must mean that there really is NO EVIDENCE.


Ahh boy.. turd logic is fun.
 

rrrr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
15,097
Reaction score
32,946
It's not even worth answering.

What a bitter little fucktard.
 

t&y

t&y
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
15,715
Reaction score
27,675
For our next trick, we will find about 10 people, all who really really believe there was no evidence (actual tangible evidence need not apply), then we'll have them testify. That should make things really clear right GMAC?
 

YumaRivernaut

How Far Off Was I?
Joined
Jun 24, 2019
Messages
5,022
Reaction score
7,919
giphy.gif
You're so silly.
 

Grandpa mac

Now politics is kinda boring ;)
Joined
May 20, 2016
Messages
5,249
Reaction score
978
Finally some clarity here. So using the Libturd logic for criminal proceedings, because he DID NOT say there was "no evidence", that must mean that there really is NO EVIDENCE.


Ahh boy.. turd logic is fun.
Ok, T&Y heres what Mueller said . You tell me whether it sounds ANYTHING like "not guilty"

“Under longstanding department policy, a president cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office,” Mueller said in his first public comments in two years.

“A Special Counsel’s Office is part of the Department of Justice, and by regulation, it was bound by that department policy,” Mueller said.

“Charging the president with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider,” the former FBI director said.

“The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting President of wrongdoing,” Mueller added, in what appeared to be a reference to the impeachment powers of Congress.
 

yz450mm

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2013
Messages
3,427
Reaction score
6,772
You guys need ask why this GMAC Caricature Checks in here everyday and takes abuse on literally every possible subject or issue.For sure entertaining, but after 3 years of total negative input you gotta wonder why,what is the end game?
Seems like him and another frequent poster on here have a lot of parallels. Gturd posts in blocks, wouldn't be too hard to look and see if him and a couple of other members were ever online at the same time.

He even threw it out there that he could possibly have an alternate ego on RDP; I know of another member that likes to foreshadow things to get the attention...

A narcissistic egomaniac would probably be capable of doing anything and everything just to get all the attention he could. Just saying...

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 

t&y

t&y
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
15,715
Reaction score
27,675
Ok, T&Y heres what Mueller said . You tell me whether it sounds ANYTHING like "not guilty"

“Under longstanding department policy, a president cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office,” Mueller said in his first public comments in two years.

“A Special Counsel’s Office is part of the Department of Justice, and by regulation, it was bound by that department policy,” Mueller said.

“Charging the president with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider,” the former FBI director said.

“The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting President of wrongdoing,” Mueller added, in what appeared to be a reference to the impeachment powers of Congress.
Yup crystal clear. He was sent on a mission and failed. Then he had to cover his ass by explaining.. "Oh well, we couldn't charge him anyways"...
 

Grandpa mac

Now politics is kinda boring ;)
Joined
May 20, 2016
Messages
5,249
Reaction score
978
Seems like him and another frequent poster on here have a lot of parallels. Gturd posts in blocks, wouldn't be too hard to look and see if him and a couple of other members were ever online at the same time.

He even threw it out there that he could possibly have an alternate ego on RDP; I know of another member that likes to foreshadow things to get the attention...

A narcissistic egomaniac would probably be capable of doing anything and everything just to get all the attention he could. Just saying...

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
Funny you’ve described the very personality disorder psychiatrists have used to describe Trump!

Out of curiosity, which other RDP member is my alt-ego?
 

Grandpa mac

Now politics is kinda boring ;)
Joined
May 20, 2016
Messages
5,249
Reaction score
978
Yup crystal clear. He was sent on a mission and failed. Then he had to cover his ass by explaining.. "Oh well, we couldn't charge him anyways"...
Sounds likely at least one Mueller related charge for the impeachment.
 

yz450mm

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2013
Messages
3,427
Reaction score
6,772
Funny you’ve described the very personality disorder psychiatrists have used to describe Trump!

Out of curiosity, which other RDP member is my alt-ego?
Personality disorder or not, he's a very rich man, with a successful family, a hot wife, and just so happens to be the president of the United States of America. You can call him whatever you want, but the jealousy is very apparent!

Regarding your alt-ego, anybody that's paying attention knows exactly what I'm talking about.

All the best! [emoji106]

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 

Carlson-jet

Not Giving A Fuck Is An Art
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
7,785
Reaction score
7,947
A
Dudes”Hard ons” and Big Mikes Cock are constantly fighting for position in CTG”S foil lined cranium!:D
GPAU:)
You sir are first with a scoop on this conspiracy. Has Big Mike been neglecting your needs? Stand up, for your right, to Big Mikes favorite positions! :D
 

Sandlord

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2011
Messages
10,189
Reaction score
24,572
Once again, the Supreme Court has overruled a decision made by an Obama appointed judge.

#BREAKING: The Supreme Court has blocked a lower court decision that allowed the House to subpoena Mazars for Pres. Trump's financial records.
 

Grandpa mac

Now politics is kinda boring ;)
Joined
May 20, 2016
Messages
5,249
Reaction score
978
Once again, the Supreme Court has overruled a decision made by an Obama appointed judge.

#BREAKING: The Supreme Court has blocked a lower court decision that allowed the House to subpoena Mazars for Pres. Trump's financial records.
It’s on hold pending SCOTUS review of Circuit decision. Could take until summer for a decision but SCOTUS has not overturned Circuit court.

Meanwhile, a Circuit judge just ruled that McGahn must testify and same ruling would apply to Bolton an possible even Trump himself.
 

wallnutz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2010
Messages
7,256
Reaction score
15,420
It’s on hold pending SCOTUS review of Circuit decision. Could take until summer for a decision but SCOTUS has not overturned Circuit court.

Meanwhile, a Circuit judge just ruled that McGahn must testify and same ruling would apply to Bolton an possible even Trump himself.
Lol They will never make Trump testify. Say something else funny, it’s been a boring day.
 

Sandlord

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2011
Messages
10,189
Reaction score
24,572
It’s on hold pending SCOTUS review of Circuit decision. Could take until summer for a decision but SCOTUS has not overturned Circuit court.

Meanwhile, a Circuit judge just ruled that McGahn must testify and same ruling would apply to Bolton an possible even Trump himself.

wrong thread, but once again, another Obama appointed judge on that ruling as well. It's also being appealed.
 

Grandpa mac

Now politics is kinda boring ;)
Joined
May 20, 2016
Messages
5,249
Reaction score
978
According to today’s court decision the President is not immune from being called to testify.
 

was thatguy

living in a cage of fear
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
51,582
Reaction score
95,491
What a God Damned waste of time and MY MONEY!

All these fucking TDS Dems need run the fuck off.

Swear to God, sifting Trumps shit for peanuts.
 

Grandpa mac

Now politics is kinda boring ;)
Joined
May 20, 2016
Messages
5,249
Reaction score
978
Once again, the Supreme Court has overruled a decision made by an Obama appointed judge.

#BREAKING: The Supreme Court has blocked a lower court decision that allowed the House to subpoena Mazars for Pres. Trump's financial records.

By the way, the Circuit ruling regarding Trump taxes was not an “Obama appointed judge”; it was 8 out of 11 judges of the Circuit.
 

RVR SWPR

Almost Off the Grid
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
9,420
Reaction score
13,015
Gotta question why a person would be of the opinion acceptable to demand personal information from anyone?

AC62D0DB-DF68-4E3E-9D91-5DD5582CAF0C.jpeg

Fucking Creep,so far not going to happen.
 

Sandlord

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2011
Messages
10,189
Reaction score
24,572
By the way, the Circuit ruling regarding Trump taxes was not an “Obama appointed judge”; it was 8 out of 11 judges of the Circuit.

3 judges, 2 obama appointed, 1 clinton appointed.

A three-judge panel of the 2nd Circuit Court Appeals unanimously ruled that the president is not immune from investigative steps taken by state prosecutors, such as a grand jury subpoena. Trump now plans to go to the Supreme Court to try to block the disclosure, said Jay Sekulow, an attorney for the president. A spokesman for Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance, whose office initially sought Trump's tax records, declined to comment on Monday's decision.

“After reviewing historical and legal precedent, we conclude only that presidential immunity does not bar the enforcement of a state grand jury subpoena directing a third party to produce non-privileged material, even when the subject matter under investigation pertains to the President,” Katzmann wrote, in an opinion joined by Judges Denny Chin and Christopher Droney.
 

wallnutz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2010
Messages
7,256
Reaction score
15,420
By the way, the Circuit ruling regarding Trump taxes was not an “Obama appointed judge”; it was 8 out of 11 judges of the Circuit.
3 judges, 2 obama appointed, 1 clinton appointed.

A three-judge panel of the 2nd Circuit Court Appeals unanimously ruled that the president is not immune from investigative steps taken by state prosecutors, such as a grand jury subpoena. Trump now plans to go to the Supreme Court to try to block the disclosure, said Jay Sekulow, an attorney for the president. A spokesman for Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance, whose office initially sought Trump's tax records, declined to comment on Monday's decision.

“After reviewing historical and legal precedent, we conclude only that presidential immunity does not bar the enforcement of a state grand jury subpoena directing a third party to produce non-privileged material, even when the subject matter under investigation pertains to the President,” Katzmann wrote, in an opinion joined by Judges Denny Chin and Christopher Droney.
WOMP WOMP funny man, now do some tricks for us jester.
 

Grandpa mac

Now politics is kinda boring ;)
Joined
May 20, 2016
Messages
5,249
Reaction score
978
3 judges, 2 obama appointed, 1 clinton appointed.

A three-judge panel of the 2nd Circuit Court Appeals unanimously ruled that the president is not immune from investigative steps taken by state prosecutors, such as a grand jury subpoena. Trump now plans to go to the Supreme Court to try to block the disclosure, said Jay Sekulow, an attorney for the president. A spokesman for Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance, whose office initially sought Trump's tax records, declined to comment on Monday's decision.

“After reviewing historical and legal precedent, we conclude only that presidential immunity does not bar the enforcement of a state grand jury subpoena directing a third party to produce non-privileged material, even when the subject matter under investigation pertains to the President,” Katzmann wrote, in an opinion joined by Judges Denny Chin and Christopher Droney.
DC Circuit Court reviewed en bank with 8 of 11 judges agreeing with original decision of 3 judge panel.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...9-8906-ab6b60de9124_story.html?outputType=amp
 

RVR SWPR

Almost Off the Grid
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
9,420
Reaction score
13,015
When confiscating personal property becomes some sort of fucked up victory.
49452655-3647-4DAD-8128-D271ED934FB5.jpeg
 

YumaRivernaut

How Far Off Was I?
Joined
Jun 24, 2019
Messages
5,022
Reaction score
7,919

stokerwhore

aka bordsmnj
Joined
Dec 12, 2007
Messages
4,198
Reaction score
4,339
and now we can sue to see all their tax returns thanks to the new precedent that has been set by that ruling? is that a boomerang? time will tell:D:eek:
 
Top