Unfortunately socialism and nationalist socialism is a widely favored view even in America.
Benji the Globalist Cuck
In case you haven’t heard, Blackrock is buying up houses, paying way over list because.................you’ll own nothing and like it. Great Reset Mouthpiece Faggot Benjiwww.riverdavesplace.com
Awesoem video, I will share it.
Perhaps. But I don't think it is as widely favored as the MSM would have us believe. It will be amazing when the people coming from socialist countries vote logically like the Puerto Ricans in Florida did.
Liberals have always believed that more government regulation is the solution.
Unfortunately now we have former “conservatives” bemoaning people being able to sell their house for “way over list”.
Its a slippery slope to serfdom where free markets and capitalism can no longer decide when an individual can sell or not sell their house for whatever someone will pay.
I’m less optimistic than you for the future when “conservatives” start undermining free markets and capitalism and complain about the free market outcomes.
It does not matter who bemoans what.
As far as housing markets go, we have supply chain problems. We have a supply and demand problem. We have a LOT of foreign money coming in driving up prices IE manipulating the free market - we have no way of knowing if they are conservative or not.
Nothing lasts forever and this too will pass.
The fact remains that socialists and marxists living here, that want the US to go the same way, have no clue for what they are asking. It would be great to send them to the socialist crap hole of their choice for a year.
I really do believe that they think that they'll have a better life and be free of all responsibility of all kinds. Who doesn't want that? Poor ignorant souls.
A seller should be free to sell to a buyer whether foreign or domestic. That is the free market. Secondly black stone capital who those bemoan is a US capitalistic enterprise.
Those bemoaning such sales and arguing that such sales are inconsistent with capitalism or that the government should dictate who a seller can or can not sell to is the direct road to nationalistic socialism.
Unfortunately socialism and nationalist socialism is a widely favored view even in America.
Benji the Globalist Cuck
In case you haven’t heard, Blackrock is buying up houses, paying way over list because.................you’ll own nothing and like it. Great Reset Mouthpiece Faggot Benjiwww.riverdavesplace.com
A seller should be free to sell to a buyer whether foreign or domestic.
Last I heard that is still the case or did I miss that memo?
Not so much what you sell it for but rather who you sell it to.Liberals have always believed that more government regulation is the solution.
Unfortunately now we have former “conservatives” bemoaning people being able to sell their house for “way over list”.
Its a slippery slope to serfdom where free markets and capitalism can no longer decide when an individual can sell or not sell their house for whatever someone will pay.
I’m less optimistic than you for the future when “conservatives” start undermining free markets and capitalism and complain about the free market outcomes.
A seller should be free to sell to a buyer whether foreign or domestic. That is the free market....
....that the government should dictate who a seller can or can not sell to is the direct road to nationalistic socialism.
Really? So arms and weapons manufacturers should be able to sell to whoever they want? Northrop Grumman should be able to sell F-35s to China if they want? Liquor stores should be able to sell to 12 year olds?
The point is the government controls certain types of sales as a matter of national security or societal stability.While home and property sales do not have such an obvious impact to national security or the stability of the country, if we continue to sell our land to the wrong people, it's eventually going to have a very negative impact on the country. We're seeing it already.
The government placing restrictions on certain types of sales isn't necessarily socialism. Provided it's done in the right places, it ensures the continuity of our economy and makes sure we're putting America first.
But being as reliant on China and other countries as you are for your living, I can see why you'd support the US selling out to those countries. To hell with what it ends up doing to this country, right?
Really? So arms and weapons manufacturers should be able to sell to whoever they want? Northrop Grumman should be able to sell F-35s to China if they want? Liquor stores should be able to sell to 12 year olds?
The point is the government controls certain types of sales as a matter of national security or societal stability.While home and property sales do not have such an obvious impact to national security or the stability of the country, if we continue to sell our land to the wrong people, it's eventually going to have a very negative impact on the country. We're seeing it already.
The government placing restrictions on certain types of sales isn't necessarily socialism. Provided it's done in the right places, it ensures the continuity of our economy and makes sure we're putting America first.
But being as reliant on China and other countries as you are for your living, I can see why you'd support the US selling out to those countries. To hell with what it ends up doing to this country, right?
Really? So arms and weapons manufacturers should be able to sell to whoever they want? Northrop Grumman should be able to sell F-35s to China if they want? Liquor stores should be able to sell to 12 year olds?
The point is the government controls certain types of sales as a matter of national security or societal stability.While home and property sales do not have such an obvious impact to national security or the stability of the country, if we continue to sell our land to the wrong people, it's eventually going to have a very negative impact on the country. We're seeing it already.
The government placing restrictions on certain types of sales isn't necessarily socialism. Provided it's done in the right places, it ensures the continuity of our economy and makes sure we're putting America first.
But being as reliant on China and other countries as you are for your living, I can see why you'd support the US selling out to those countries. To hell with what it ends up doing to this country, right?
Regor was not talking about foreign buyers or sellers of arms but a US company buying US houses from US sellers.
His point was that this US company should not be allowed to do so. And anyone who supported a seller trying to get the highest dollar for his house even from a US buyer is a “cuck“. The government should intervene and prevent a seller from selling to a US company. I disagree as that is they type of restriction that a socialist country would implement.
With respect to the foreign comments, I find it ironic that those most vocally critical of China’s penchant for state control over the economic marketplace are the very same people arguing for more and more US government control over the US economic marketplace, of course for societal stability..........
There’s a difference in those two pictures.
One man is telling the WCF to get fucked and the other runs it.
Yore too easy lil Benji, you and Jen should hang out!!!
There’s a difference in those two pictures.
One man is telling the WCF to get fucked and the other runs it.
Yore too easy lil Benji, you and Jen should hang out!!!
You mean Cubans. Puerto Rico is a US territory.Perhaps. But I don't think it is as widely favored as the MSM would have us believe. It will be amazing when the people coming from socialist countries vote logically like the Puerto Ricans in Florida did.
Uh huh.
You mean the guy who has his and his families branded products manufactured in China and who primarily uses foreign capital providers for his US and foreign assets, yet convinces you into believing he is America first?
Denial, it’s not just a river in Egypt.
that is a damned interesting perspective, fraught with hazards on what is important at any particular moment.Really? So arms and weapons manufacturers should be able to sell to whoever they want? Northrop Grumman should be able to sell F-35s to China if they want? Liquor stores should be able to sell to 12 year olds?
The point is the government controls certain types of sales as a matter of national security or societal stability.While home and property sales do not have such an obvious impact to national security or the stability of the country, if we continue to sell our land to the wrong people, it's eventually going to have a very negative impact on the country. We're seeing it already.
The government placing restrictions on certain types of sales isn't necessarily socialism. Provided it's done in the right places, it ensures the continuity of our economy and makes sure we're putting America first.
But being as reliant on China and other countries as you are for your living, I can see why you'd support the US selling out to those countries. To hell with what it ends up doing to this country, right?
Back to BlackRock... Here's why I think it is not a good thing. When a big player comes in and disrupts the market, the free market no longer works. This is why we have anit-trust laws on the books since 1890. - The Sherman Act.
We shouldn't be mad at BlackRock for legally making a buck, we should be mad at the Fed's insane monetary policy which is driving down the cost of loans and creating a massive bubble.
Here is some interesting reading on BlackRock: you can draw your own conclusions.
https://thelibertydaily.com/yes-blackrocks-home-buying-spree-should-concern-you/
Looks like this home buying has been going on for a while. As far back as 2011.
https://nypost.com/2020/07/18/corporations-are-buying-houses-robbing-families-of-american-dream/amp/
Skip to 10 minutes 45 seconds: https://rumble.com/vieksh-the-plagu...dsouza-podcast-ep-109.html?mref=23gga&mrefc=3
are we heading toward a discussion of the inequitable attributes of free market capitalism? this could be a watershed.Why is a big player seeing an opportunity and entering a market bad or antithetical to free markets.
They see an opportunity and believe they can pay up and still make money. Why isn’t that the exact function of free markets?
sellers were not getting full price prior to the entry of the big player. Now they are.
Uh huh.
You mean the guy who has his and his families branded products manufactured in China and who primarily uses foreign capital providers for his US and foreign assets, yet convinces you into believing he is America first?
Denial, it’s not just a river in Egypt.
Back to BlackRock... Here's why I think it is not a good thing. When a big player comes in and disrupts the market, the free market no longer works. This is why we have anit-trust laws on the books since 1890. - The Sherman Act.
We shouldn't be mad at BlackRock for legally making a buck, we should be mad at the Fed's insane monetary policy which is driving down the cost of loans and creating a massive bubble.
Here is some interesting reading on BlackRock: you can draw your own conclusions.
https://thelibertydaily.com/yes-blackrocks-home-buying-spree-should-concern-you/
Looks like this home buying has been going on for a while. As far back as 2011.
https://nypost.com/2020/07/18/corporations-are-buying-houses-robbing-families-of-american-dream/amp/
Skip to 10 minutes 45 seconds: https://rumble.com/vieksh-the-plagu...dsouza-podcast-ep-109.html?mref=23gga&mrefc=3
Equates a rich man borrowing money to home affordability for the middle class.
hahaha yore the best lil Benji!!
I thought it was the preface to his autobiography...
No, you should be mad at the globalists at Blackrock, they’re trying to F the middle class, low income renters and institute the Great Reset.
He’s a soulless globalist ghoul, have fun.
Regor was not talking about foreign buyers or sellers of arms but a US company buying US houses from US sellers.
His point was that this US company should not be allowed to do so. And anyone who supported a seller trying to get the highest dollar for his house even from a US buyer is a “cuck“. The government should intervene and prevent a seller from selling to a US company. I disagree as that is they type of restriction that a socialist country would implement.
With respect to the foreign comments, I find it ironic that those most vocally critical of China’s penchant for state control over the economic marketplace are the very same people arguing for more and more US government control over the US economic marketplace, of course for societal stability..........
Sorry to bitch slap your strict ideology that keeps you from thinking... this is not capitalism. Wise up! The fed is lending Blackrock money at a below market rate. Privatize the gain, socialize the loss. The seller is also not profiting...you have to live somewhere. Taxes for everywhere other than so cal is market based. We’re you dropped on your head? Your ignorance is Astounding! worse than a liberal because you can‘t think towards your core beliefWhy is a big player seeing an opportunity and entering a market bad or antithetical to free markets.
They see an opportunity and believe they can pay up and still make money. Why isn’t that the exact function of free markets?
sellers were not getting full price prior to the entry of the big player. Now they are.
Sorry to bitch slap your strict ideology that keeps you from thinking... this is not capitalism. Wise up! The fed is lending Blackrock money at a below market rate. Privatize the gain, socialize the loss. The seller is also not profiting...you have to live somewhere. Taxes for everywhere other than so cal is market based. We’re you dropped on your head? Your ignorance is Astounding! worse than a liberal because you can‘t think towards your core belief
WRONG! Take a close look at market cap rates. Not 1 single private investor would be interested. Wake up BOOMER!The fed is not lending to black rock at below market rates. They are not a bank and do not have access to the fed window. The federal government is backing loans to their competitors, specifically individuals.
Honestly @530RL you piss me off more that Jen, squeeze, and grads combined. With friends like you...who needs enemies. Fund buying in this nation with gubment funds is the definition of fascism. That’s your position
The irony of course is that Trump and the black rock CEO are buddies and the Trump administration did take care of those soulless globalist buddies.
Private Inequity: How a Powerful Industry Conquered the Tax System
There were two weeks left in the Trump administration when the Treasury Department handed down a set of rules governing an obscure corner of the tax code. Overseen by a senior Treasury official whose previous job involved helping the wealthy avoid taxes, the new regulations represented a major...www.yahoo.com
I'm sure he got Jeff's OK!!The NYT via Yahoo..............TDS at it finest!!!
View attachment 1013065
Does yore wife know yore posting down here again?
if I may, and respectfully in agreement with you, it may be a security control to let prices rise, perhaps by alot, to prevent foreign actors or concerns from acquisition of US territory or to encourage private equity to properly value or take on the risk of overvaluation in the housing market rather than private individuals.We agree there is a problem, your solution is more government, mine is less. They used to call such views as mine conservative.