boatpi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2012
- Messages
- 8,036
- Reaction score
- 11,954
DIESEL finally, Colorado diesel.
No, that’s not going to happen... We are looking forward to the 2021 GMC Yukon’s and the 2021 Escalades.Gunna push toward 100k
It’s too bad that GM didn’t put the Tahoe/Suburban dash in the LTZ equipped trucks. The new interior and dash in the new trucks is hideous and I’ve been a hardcore GM guy.
There’s a mid-cycle interior redesign that supposed to be coming to the trucks very soon [emoji106]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Don't understand why Chrysler never put out a ram based suv, woulda sold wellJeeps new Grand Waggoneer will be out next year, I bet based on the RAM 1500 like the Jeep Gladiator.
Don't understand why Chrysler never put out a ram based suv, woulda sold well
I’m still waiting for any of the big 3 to put out another Excursion type SUV, fullsize 2500-3500 diesel with enough GVWR to actually tow something. I’m sure it will be 75k, but I’d still be a buyer.
Public sentiment killed the Excursion, and government regs basically make it difficult for carmakers to market these vehicles to the public.
But you can absolutely get a 3/4-ton Suburban from GM - they market and sell them to fleets, and they’re pricey.
They also aren’t available with the Duramax [emoji107]
More info here:
http://gmauthority.com/blog/2019/02/the-chevy-suburban-hd-needs-gms-new-6-6l-v8-l8t-engine/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
I am fully aware of the reasons for the X’s demise, and have spent plenty of time on the GM fleet site configuring the 2500 SUB, but, for my use, it would need to have more than 3500lb towing (I’m not building a bulletproof SUV) and would need to have a diesel and a GVWR over 10k so I could tow a decent size Toyhauler, legally. I know that will probably never happen, but if it did, regardless of manufacturer, I would be a buyer, even at a price WAY higher than I would be comfortable with. Until then, I’ll keep my Ram CTD, lol.
I could be mistaken, but I recall reading that the Suburban HD doesn’t come with a hitch receiver, so your hypothesis makes sense [emoji106]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Wow, a Chevy expedition lolView attachment 824663 Just took these this evening at the RenCen in Detroit. Really good looking vehicle. Fit and finish was very good considering it’s a preproduction unit View attachment 824661 View attachment 824662
Wife needs a dog and grandkid hauler and that is more appealing than the Honda Pilot.I'm down-sizing. Don't need the room of my '16 Tahoe any longer. Got this on order. Should be in by Christmas.
2020 Acadia Denali - Fully packed.
Still have my Sierra for towing and the boat. I think I only towed with the Tahoe a couple times in 3 years.
View attachment 824598
View attachment 824600
I wonder why the tow rating of the “Suburban HD” is so low?
GVWR and payload are decent...but a 3,000 lb tow rating is silly.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
That's insane. The Acadia (3.6 6 cyl, 9 spd trans / AWD, 3.49 rear) I ordered with the "Trailering Package" (receiver, additional trans and eng cooling, 170 amp alt, etc) is rated at 4,000#. I wouldn't tow that much any distance, due to the relatively small wheel base, but still........................
Hell. I did launch and recover my 22' pontoon with my Jeep TJ. But that was only a 2 mile drive to the Casino launch.
I don’t get that.....a lot of people buy SUVs to tow....makes no sense. And the should offer the 4.10 rear end.
It’s the pussification of trucks and SUVs brought about by Obama when he BKed GMC and went all crazy on the “climate change” scam.
They don’t want us to have big gas engine boats and off road toys.
Boatpi beat me to it. The new transmissions have such lower and tighter gearing that there is zero need for that much gear reduction. The 3.42's are pretty much the 4.10's of previous generations.With 8 speed+ transmissions a 4.10 is history.
FINALLY an independent rear suspension. Geez, did GM ever milk that truck platform for years.
The title says “Suburban-Tahoe,” NOT “Truck.”So, 85 years of a straight axle means nothing? Apparently they fucked up. For 85 years.
Next hot item with be a straight axle kit for front and rear...
You want a car? Get a miata...
Dan'l
Just bought this brand new 2019 Denali for $66,500 with all the rebates. I'm happy.
View attachment 824998
The title says “Suburban-Tahoe,” NOT “Truck.”
If I want a truck, I’ll buy a truck. Suburban-Tahoe are SUVs and must compete with other better handling competitors ALL of whom moved to independent rear suspensions years ago.
Suppose you’re still mourning the Mustang’s move away from a solid live axle . . .
Lots of people buy Tahoes and Suburbans for towing. I think the independent rear suspension is not going to do well for towing with very much tongue weight. Anybody have opinions on towing with and independent rear suspension??
Also, independent rear suspension is going to give you twice as many things to go wrong on the rear end
Towing with IRS isn’t really an issue, provided your vehicle is setup properly [emoji106]
Proper setup = load-leveling/airbags
Unlike a live axle, which has geometry that doesn’t change under load / as it cycles, an IRS has significant geometry changes under load / as it cycles. So it’s critical to maintain the stock ride height regardless of load.
Any carmaker’s towing package for an IRS vehicle is gonna have bags or something else (like load-leveling shocks) to maintain ride height.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Boatpi beat me to it. The new transmissions have such lower and tighter gearing that there is zero need for that much gear reduction. The 3.42's are pretty much the 4.10's of previous generations.
Sent from my LM-G710VM using Tapatalk
Time will tell. One main benefit is higher cruising speeds at much lower rpms. I run 80 at 1700 rpm. 85 at 1900. Still getting 19mpg. 4wd, 3.42's, leveled 33's.Do you think that 8 speed tranny and 3.42 are going to last as long as my 4 speed tranny and 4.10 year end? I’ve got 190,000 flawless miles on mine. I don’t give a shit about a couple miles per gallon, I like going up an on ramp and being at 90 mph before I merge on the Interstate and cruise at 80 and 2700 RPMs.
Time will tell. One main benefit is higher cruising speeds at much lower rpms. I run 80 at 1700 rpm. 85 at 1900. Still getting 19mpg. 4wd, 3.42's, leveled 33's.
We had an ‘11 Tahoe we bought new as a DD until ‘16. Tried downsizing to a couple of Jeep GC’s, but they didn’t compare to the Tahoe. When I heard the new SUVs were going IRS, we decided to pick up another Tahoe before the update. We are back in a ‘19 Tahoe and couldn’t be happier. Even with the solid axle out back the ride is excellent. No other brand makes an SUV that compares to the offerings from GM, IMO.
I will be watching the new model when it comes out, but plan on holding onto ours for awhile.
I’m sure you already know. But IMO its to accommodate armor upfits for government work. No other reason in my eyes why payload and towing have such a difference. At any rate, without a diesel, or at least a SOLID Big Block type engine option it’s a no-go for me. If a suburban with a big towing capacity and a decent gas option were available now I would have ordered it, lol...
The 8 speed, maybe not. One of the reasons it's being phased out by the 10 speed. Yes I believe the 10 speed will last behind a small block. They are putting it behind the new Duramax and the new 7.3 Ford gasser so I bet it'll live. And also, you're just referring to final drive ratio for acceleration and the 10 speed with a 3.42 has a much tighter ratio gap as well as being similar overall ratio so the acceleration will also likely (I don't know the exact numbers to say for certain) be quiet faster everything else being equal. It's really the same argument as the 3 speed with 3.73's and a 4 speed with 4.56's. except the 4 vs 10 speed discussion is literally comparing a TH400 to a cutting edge transmission designed to live behind big power.Do you think that 8 speed tranny and 3.42 are going to last as long as my 4 speed tranny and 4.10 year end? I’ve got 190,000 flawless miles on mine. I don’t give a shit about a couple miles per gallon, I like going up an on ramp and being at 90 mph before I merge on the Interstate and cruise at 80 and 2700 RPMs.
There’s a class-action lawsuit for the 8-speed...my buddy has a 2017 Denali 1500 that’s affected.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Boatpi beat me to it. The new transmissions have such lower and tighter gearing that there is zero need for that much gear reduction. The 3.42's are pretty much the 4.10's of previous generations.
Sent from my LM-G710VM using Tapatalk
I’ve always been 100% Chevy, until 2019! Chevy sent the Silverado down the Tundra and ruined the front, and Ford hit a Homerun at the same time. If i was buying it’d be the F250 right now.They better hurry. That F350 Tremor is looking wayyyyyyy better in and out.
Since they are designed to be a very robust trans with a multitude of applications ranging from the new Duramax all the way down to a Camaro and the new Ranger.... I think they'll hold us just fine. Shit, both Ford and GM are putting this 10 speed in damn near everything. Also for that reason, rebuild costs may be held in check.My question is how well will these transmissions hold up vs. the old technology of rear gear ratios?
I’m thinking rebuild costs will be in the Allison rebuild price range ?