TCHB
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2008
- Messages
- 11,096
- Reaction score
- 8,008
You will keep supplying it to avoid all of us moving thereYep, Nevada will keep supplying SoCal with power, because not in our backyard!!!!!!
You guys are spreading like cancer , We have Los Raiders now...You will keep supplying it to avoid all of us moving there
You guys are spreading like cancer , We have Los Raiders now...
Being honest, the in California we do it like this, I'm from Cali, that bullshit gets exhausting. If it's so fucking great go back. (I'm not saying you, but I hear it so much)
I've worked on quite a few solar fields here and the power can be pushed anywhere, but guess where most of it goes?
Always remember all power plants are built today after a utility puts out a RFP for a specific amount and type it needs. The days of building a merchant plant. Wit no long term PPA went out with Enron.You guys are spreading like cancer , We have Los Raiders now...
Being honest, the in California we do it like this, I'm from Cali, that bullshit gets exhausting. If it's so fucking great go back. (I'm not saying you, but I hear it so much)
I've worked on quite a few solar fields here and the power can be pushed anywhere, but guess where most of it goes?
Our neighbor at Islander drives every weekend from Utah.My wife finally said she is open to moving. My conservative voting tax base is most likely heading to southern Utah. Wife loves to hike, and the proximity to outdoor activities is a requirement for our next home.
What percent of power in your state is nuclear?Fuck your state. Should be 50% nuke min.
Which one? Have on seen any utah plates on our row.Our neighbor at Islander drives every weekend from Utah.
#242 I think. Gold pusher MH. Has the black and white DCB. Chris i think. Use to have the big black dog, Tito.Which one? Have on seen any utah plates on our row.
No comment to ignorant comments.Fuck your state. Should be 50% nuke min.
Honestly I agree with nuclear power, it is the most efficient, people hear uranium and automatically freak out.No comment to ignorant comments.
One of the solar fields I was involved with, was designated for the LA County School district. The Land it's on is leased, California contractors built it, and the electricity is owned by a private company. The private company got the tax breaks from the Obama Era, and they build them for free, some of these fields are in the billions. Only to sell the power right back to you.Arizona and Nevada get most of the power. Smaller cities in California have contracts for Some of their energy needs.
Of the renewables, I'm thinking that is a lot of solar? I don't know how much a wind turbine puts out, and I also don't know how many they have now in the state. How big is the drop after sundown? I would think commercial need would be less, but then more people at home watching TV (or on RDP).As of now this minute here is the mix of generation. View attachment 1116578
As of now this minute here is the mix of generation. View attachment 1116578
Big white dog was Tito. Awesome dog!#242 I think. Gold pusher MH. Has the black and white DCB. Chris i think. Use to have the big black dog, Tito.
Grow your own foodFuck your state. Should be 50% nuke min.
Honestly I agree with nuclear power, it is the most efficient, people hear uranium and automatically freak out.
I'll be looking forward to the generator plug in threads for the Santa Ana winds, and the rolling blackouts for not enough power in the grid this summer.
California constantly shoots themselves in the foot, not allowing easements for overhead power lines (then sues the power company). Brown pulled how many millions from the deforestation and maintenance for the underbrush, and the dead trees for the bark beetles? We can't cut that dead tree down because an off gray woodpecker likes to poke at it.
Where I'm headed with this, is clean energy is the dirtiest form of energy, but it's not in your backyard, so since you don't see it you think all is well.
I really don't understand this whole mindset, but what's currently happening is not okay.
I think @TCHB Is poking the bear, but I really don't think you know what you're talking about.
As of now this minute here is the mix of generation. View attachment 1116578
I just going to play devils advocate here. If tax payers pay for the capital expense of building the facility, who pays for it's operation maintenance and upgrades over time? I am sure the post commissioning expenses on said renewable facilities are a fraction of what it would be for a more traditional plant, but there are still costs, no?Ain't it fun to pay to build power plants and solar/wind farms then have these same fucknuts sell you back the power created by your own tax dollars....
Of the renewables, I'm thinking that is a lot of solar? I don't know how much a wind turbine puts out, and I also don't know how many they have now in the state. How big is the drop after sundown? I would think commercial need would be less, but then more people at home watching TV (or on RDP).
Where do you get this info from?
Honestly I agree with nuclear power, it is the most efficient, people hear uranium and automatically freak out.
I'll be looking forward to the generator plug in threads for the Santa Ana winds, and the rolling blackouts for not enough power in the grid this summer.
California constantly shoots themselves in the foot, not allowing easements for overhead power lines (then sues the power company). Brown pulled how many millions from the deforestation and maintenance for the underbrush, and the dead trees for the bark beetles? We can't cut that dead tree down because an off gray woodpecker likes to poke at it.
Where I'm headed with this, is clean energy is the dirtiest form of energy, but it's not in your backyard, so since you don't see it you think all is well.
I really don't understand this whole mindset, but what's currently happening is not okay.
I think @TCHB Is poking the bear, but I really don't think you know what you're talking about.
We sold most of our bio mass plants about 10 years ago. They were money losers!
This is normal day on the grid. When the fires start generation backs down because of shedding load on lines in the fire danger area.
I just going to play devils advocate here. If tax payers pay for the capital expense of building the facility, who pays for it's operation maintenance and upgrades over time? I am sure the post commissioning expenses on said renewable facilities are a fraction of what it would be for a more traditional plant, but there are still costs, no?
Well aren’t you just a ray of sunshine.Yikes, how reliant we are on renewables is concerning during a heat wave. What’s that going to look like at night time? Solar don’t work without that fiery orange ball in the sky.
The gas plants that sitting down not needed wii come into service during the hot summer months. Their capacity wii be around 15% for the year. Yes we pay them to sit down not needed. This is called a capacity contract.The utility SCE makes it money for its shareholders by Capital Expenditure. The CPUC sets the rate around 10%.. All other costs are a pas through to the rate payer including fuel. The independent power producers like AES have a PPA contract to supply MWs according to the PPA. Our PPA was 80 pages long.
Yikes, how reliant we are on renewables is concerning during a heat wave. What’s that going to look like at night time? Solar don’t work without that fiery orange ball in the sky.
So why do you not like nuclear then?Nuclear build cost is about them times higher than conventional gas fired plants and 50 times more for O&M costs. Todays new power plants cycle up and down quickly and then shut down at night when not needed and restart up in the early morning. I am sure our smart electrical engineers will figure it out for the next 50 years. People do not understand the grid, power stations, peakers, dams and the PPA contracts that make this whole thing work. I spent 38 years in power world and it still made me think how complex the so called grid is. Did you know the power plants manage time by keeping 60 cycles, tying in 100 power plants at the same time.
I have posted my opinions repeatly…@TCHB id like to hear your thoughts as well as @Xring01 thoughts.
Hopefully it can be done without personal attacks but I’d like to hear your guy’s takes on where the CA, AZ, NV, etc grid is headed.
I get the impression you two have different opinions. As some one who deals with everything south of the meter I’d appreciate your guy’s input.
Thats due to PSPS… Public Safety Power Shutoffs…
That helps break it down.Thats due to PSPS… Public Safety Power Shutoffs…
The vast majority of LADWP grid is in major urban areas, where there is not the same threat of wildfires, as it is to SCE who has lots of rural lines that are in the desert than can create a fire… As I mentioned above… SCE grid is designed to support a minimum 22,000mW and LADWP is 6000ish mW from memory.
Why do PSPS events occur… TO PREVENT WILD FIRES.That helps break it down.
On the flip side though there are a lot of residences/businesses that rely on DWP energy. Are you saying that they will be less effected vs So Cal Edison homes and businesses?
Just trying to paint a legitimate picture for CA and I guess specifically SoCal.
I’d love your take on NorCal as well.