DrunkenSailor
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2017
- Messages
- 7,483
- Reaction score
- 10,421
Is really f-in up my jacuzzi monte cristo time...
Thanks Edison ! Wind was super bad here in Alta Loma so they shut down the power
View attachment 946400
View attachment 946400
BrrrHere too only like 30* with wind at 25+
Where are you? Wind is mid teens sustained and 30ish gusts, so not too bad for Simi.Water is blowing out of my pool as spray the wind is blowing so hard. This is stupid.
What happens when we only are allowed to buy electric cars in CA, about 2 million per year, and the states electric infrastructure shuts down weekly?
We can't even get good internet last mile now, due to covid, how will a million new chargers a year work when Santa Ana's or fires hit?
Sent from my SM-T387V using Tapatalk
Where are you? Wind is mid teens sustained and 30ish gusts, so not too bad for Simi.
I swear I lose just as much water out of my pool this time of year due to the air being so dry and sucking moisture out of my pool and the wind doing what it was to your pool yesterday as I do during the summer.Lake Forest it was only a couple of big gusts but I was standing next to the pool getting wet...
Exactly the problem. If we think the grid is old, unsafe, and beyond capacity (constant blackouts and brownouts called by the CA utility companies would seem to say that statement is correct) will crash everyday when 10 million EV are put on the grid, especially at the same time to charge.Thought it interesting when reading about the new Lucid EV, the mention of how the car's stored energy can be used in reverse, to provide battery backup power to your house during outages. Thought it was an interesting marketing approach.
Exactly the problem. If we think the grid is old, unsafe, and beyond capacity (constant blackouts and brownouts called by the CA utility companies would seem to say that statement is correct) will crash everyday when 10 million EV are put on the grid, especially at the same time to charge.
a generator is much more versatile and uses the gas out of the car but doesn’t depend on the grid.
What happens when we only are allowed to buy electric cars in CA, about 2 million per year, and the states electric infrastructure shuts down weekly?
We can't even get good internet last mile now, due to covid, how will a million new chargers a year work when Santa Ana's or fires hit?
It's not the distribution power lines around town that Edison is concerned with it's the transmission lines. Several feeds coming into Simi Valley and shutting off the feeds that are vulnerable to starting fires reduced potential power supply - so the blackouts.Edison shut our power off in January for 2 days because of the winds. I called and complained, they said they don't want any wires coming down and starting a brush fire.
I live at the pin drop.
View attachment 946403
I said "First there is no brush anywhere around us and second our utilities are under ground." They said they would send someone out to inspect and see of they made a mistake. Today is the 3rd wind event this season that they have shut off power for and ours hasn't been turned off, so I guess they realized they messed up.
The bad thing is in January they left the power on for the area where the pin is and some of that is overhead, morons.
View attachment 946408
Xactly. BTW, California buys 2 million new cars a year, so 5 years into Newsom’s electric only will likely be 7 to 8 million cars or double the example, and will basically cripple the grid, or more likely usage will BE DICTATEd by the govt. CA is already doing the same thing with ammo. It’s not the hardware that needs to be limited, it’s the consumables that can be restricted to make the hardware useless.It's funny how this truth is completely ignored by the proponents of EVs.
There are roughly 15 millions registered vehicles in California. Let's suppose that at some time in the future, say 2035, 30% of those vehicles are plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs). That's 4.5 million car and trucks.
A 240 volt 40 amp charging circuit is commonly installed for vehicles with a 7.2 kW charger. That size charger will probably become more widely used in years to come, and universally provided by manufacturers at some date. The charger, obviously, consumes 7.2 kW at peak. As it takes several hours for the vehicle's battery to recharge, the current tapers off and the consumption drops accordingly.
Every hour the vehicle is charging, the amount of power it consumes becomes a kilowatt hour. Almost all charging of PEVs will be done overnight. The following figures were obtained from internet sources, and at least two were found to verify their accuracy.
This means that if those 4.5 million EVs are connected are to California's electrical grid for overnight charging, at peak charging current they will be consuming 34.2 gigawatts. The hourly consumption will thus be 34.2 gigawatt hours. This won't be continuous because the charge current tapers off, but the peak usage will be somewhere close to the above.
Right now California's electrical generation capacity is about 80 gigawatts. Out of state suppliers provide another 12 gigawatts, for a total capacity of 92 gigawatts. In August 2020, consumption of electricity on the grid reached 47 gigawatts, which forced the system operater to introduce rolling blackouts across the state.
It's more than obvious that the forced introduction of PEVs will impose a severe strain on the state's electrical generation and transmission capabilities. An increase of less than a quarter of the 32.4 gigawatts that will occur in the above-mentioned scenario will mean more and longer blackouts. It's inevitable, and will occur much sooner than 2035 because of the forced switch to PEVs mandated by the government.
There aren't enough ridges or flat open spaces to install a meaningful amount of "renewable energy". Arizona and Utah aren't going to cover their pristine deserts with energy farms to power California's needs. Well, I fucking hope not. That would be criminal. The only solution is nuclear power, and the Prius driving finger pointing liberals will never allow that.
So what is the state going to do? Will the leftist regime finally fall because they won't abandon their ridiculous plans for mandated electric vehicles and a demand that a required percentage of the state's electric power come from "green" sources?
One can only hope.
It's funny how this truth is completely ignored by the proponents of EVs.
There are roughly 15 millions registered vehicles in California. Let's suppose that at some time in the future, say 2035, 30% of those vehicles are plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs). That's 4.5 million car and trucks.
A 240 volt 40 amp charging circuit is commonly installed for vehicles with a 7.2 kW charger. That size charger will probably become more widely used in years to come, and universally provided by manufacturers at some date. The charger, obviously, consumes 7.2 kW at peak. As it takes several hours for the vehicle's battery to recharge, the current tapers off and the consumption drops accordingly.
Every hour the vehicle is charging, the amount of power it consumes becomes a kilowatt hour. Almost all charging of PEVs will be done overnight. The following figures were obtained from internet sources, and at least two were found to verify their accuracy.
This means that if those 4.5 million EVs are connected are to California's electrical grid for overnight charging, at peak charging current they will be consuming 34.2 gigawatts. The hourly consumption will thus be 34.2 gigawatt hours. This won't be continuous because the charge current tapers off, but the peak usage will be somewhere close to the above.
Right now California's electrical generation capacity is about 80 gigawatts. Out of state suppliers provide another 12 gigawatts, for a total capacity of 92 gigawatts. In August 2020, consumption of electricity on the grid reached 47 gigawatts, which forced the system operater to introduce rolling blackouts across the state.
It's more than obvious that the forced introduction of PEVs will impose a severe strain on the state's electrical generation and transmission capabilities. An increase of less than a quarter of the 32.4 gigawatts that will occur in the above-mentioned scenario will mean more and longer blackouts. It's inevitable, and will occur much sooner than 2035 because of the forced switch to PEVs mandated by the government.
There aren't enough ridges or flat open spaces to install a meaningful amount of "renewable energy". Arizona and Utah aren't going to cover their pristine deserts with energy farms to power California's needs. Well, I fucking hope not. That would be criminal. The only solution is nuclear power, and the Prius driving finger pointing liberals will never allow that.
So what is the state going to do? Will the leftist regime finally fall because they won't abandon their ridiculous plans for mandated electric vehicles and a demand that a required percentage of the state's electric power come from "green" sources?
One can only hope.
This whole electric car thing will not happen. The Libs are not the party of ANY COMMON SENSE. They are all in for the Paris energy deal. The problem is 1) Paris population is 65 million. 2) Paris has two nuclear power plants for said 65 million people Libs hate nuclear 3) Paris does not have any natural resources. Why does the greatest and most powerful country ever to exist have to follow a bunch of inferior countries? Especially France? BTW we have the some of the cleanest air quality in history. This is why its bad for liberals to be in power. They make emotional decisions and have zero common sense.It's funny how this truth is completely ignored by the proponents of EVs.
There are roughly 15 millions registered vehicles in California. Let's suppose that at some time in the future, say 2035, 30% of those vehicles are plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs). That's 4.5 million car and trucks.
A 240 volt 40 amp charging circuit is commonly installed for vehicles with a 7.2 kW charger. That size charger will probably become more widely used in years to come, and universally provided by manufacturers at some date. The charger, obviously, consumes 7.2 kW at peak. As it takes several hours for the vehicle's battery to recharge, the current tapers off and the consumption drops accordingly.
Every hour the vehicle is charging, the amount of power it consumes becomes a kilowatt hour. Almost all charging of PEVs will be done overnight. The following figures were obtained from internet sources, and at least two were found to verify their accuracy.
This means that if those 4.5 million EVs are connected are to California's electrical grid for overnight charging, at peak charging current they will be consuming 34.2 gigawatts. The hourly consumption will thus be 34.2 gigawatt hours. This won't be continuous because the charge current tapers off, but the peak usage will be somewhere close to the above.
Right now California's electrical generation capacity is about 80 gigawatts. Out of state suppliers provide another 12 gigawatts, for a total capacity of 92 gigawatts. In August 2020, consumption of electricity on the grid reached 47 gigawatts, which forced the system operater to introduce rolling blackouts across the state.
It's more than obvious that the forced introduction of PEVs will impose a severe strain on the state's electrical generation and transmission capabilities. An increase of less than a quarter of the 32.4 gigawatts that will occur in the above-mentioned scenario will mean more and longer blackouts. It's inevitable, and will occur much sooner than 2035 because of the forced switch to PEVs mandated by the government.
There aren't enough ridges or flat open spaces to install a meaningful amount of "renewable energy". Arizona and Utah aren't going to cover their pristine deserts with energy farms to power California's needs. Well, I fucking hope not. That would be criminal. The only solution is nuclear power, and the Prius driving finger pointing liberals will never allow that.
So what is the state going to do? Will the leftist regime finally fall because they won't abandon their ridiculous plans for mandated electric vehicles and a demand that a required percentage of the state's electric power come from "green" sources?
One can only hope.
Xactly. BTW, California buys 2 million new cars a year, so 5 years into Newsom’s electric only will likely be 7 to 8 million cars or double the example, and will basically cripple the grid, or more likely usage will BE DICTATEd by the govt. CA is already doing the same thing with ammo. It’s not the hardware that needs to be limited, it’s the consumables that can be restricted to make the hardware useless.
I'm excited for fusion. The power capabilities are incredible. We will finally be able to explore space for real. Combine that with potential wireless charging capabilities and the ice will be dead. Cars will be lighter and faster. Tomorrow looks awesome but is this future 14 years away or 50?