sml
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2017
- Messages
- 552
- Reaction score
- 1,096
2.0 vs 392 about 200 less hp and torque. Now if we are talking a 4XE then the numbers are pretty close.I really like the 2.0. It has alot of pep over the 3.6 and not far behind the 392. Around town 17 mpg and climbing. Drove it from California to Havasu 16mpg on 37 stock 410's. I'm going to put 488's in it.
I have a rubicon 4XE wrangler, a ‘24 392 wrangler and a northstar ranger crew. Ya only live once lol