Uncle Dave
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2008
- Messages
- 9,826
- Reaction score
- 10,933
WTF?? NICE NAME JACKASS!!
I was trying to figure out WTF was going on.
I was pretty sure you didnt 180.
WTF?? NICE NAME JACKASS!!
we'll see, hasn't always worked out too well for other animals.mRNA is 100% the future. They can use this to create initial vaccine to any new threat in under a month, then it just becomes a question of testing. As testing becomes more and more routine and ground truthing bears out the theory, the testing phase will become faster. This is a total game changer and may be the silver lining of this pandemic.
I was trying to figure out WTF was going on.
I was pretty sure you didnt 180.
I know, just the thought of forced medical procedures or forced denial of service is the new leftist way of thinking.Lol!
I’ve not read the entire thread yet.
I can tell you while I don’t really agree with Dave’s view here, and he may be a lot of things, a lefty isn’t one of them
physicians take an oath that is not likely to yield to your premises.Should you be allowed hospitalization in the case of severe symptoms requiring urgent care?
Should people be allowed to have it both ways?
My loyalty to my constitution says you should absolutely be allowed to refuse, but I do think choices should come with consequences.
physicians take an oath that is not likely to yield to your premises.
medicine and practitioners do not discriminate based upon need nor upon the individual's choice.
e.g: doctors treat everyone ...police and accused criminals wounded during conflicts... the ignorant anf the erudite...the indigent and the wealthy...they have blind loyalty to mending illness, disease, and wounds, while doing 'no harm'.
sorry, I did not see links, only the originating questions....shall I go through the entire thread to find them or will you repost them in reply?Did you read the links I put up?
sorry, I did not see links, only the originating questions....shall I go through the entire thread to find them or will you repost them in reply?
in the mean time I shall examine and catalog what I find in this postIm on a different machine right now and cant go back and look at the browsing history I got the links from - but will do so later.
UD
Just GMAC trolling
in the mean time I shall examine and catalog what I find in this post
starting now...
The Measles Dilemma: Personal Choice vs. Public Health (Who Wins?)
What is more important?nationalinterest.org
If so thats lame.
I thought you couldn't create multiple logins under the same IP address?
Just GMAC trolling
Yea well, you want to see some real motherfucking assaults on the populace?
Enact or support something as stupid as the premise of this post. I'd bet entire hospital staff dead in hundreds of cities across the world.
You don't even need guns...thousands of ways to make shit go boom available across the net.
If people who work in healthcare decide to forgo their oaths, well they can all fuck off and die.
Imagine a world divided like that, where no one wants to help anyone unless you think a certain way, do a certain thing, or purely on the color of your skin.
Fucking Nazi bitches.
Totally get the point of the identification question, and the definition of a vaccine.
Is smoking a random thing that happens?
I know, just the thought of forced medical procedures or forced denial of service is the new leftist way of thinking.
Liberty and freedom have to be exercised with personal responsibility.
No, but smokers pay higher rates for medical insurance. They damn well better get the care they're paying for. If smokers will be turned away from medical care, then the insurance companies should not write policies for smokers. You can't sell the policy knowing the condition and then refuse the service.
Oh......What about the extra strain put on hospitals by people that refuse to wear helmets on motorcycles, this is a rabbit hole....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How and why the court ruled for mandatory helmets.
During the 1970s, pressure by the federal government in the USA led virtually all states to mandate the use of motorcycle helmets (Jones & Bayer, 2007). These statutes provoked the wrath of motorcyclists who asserted that the state deprived them of the right to cycle in the way that was most pleasurable and exciting, and that failure to use helmets posed no threat to others. In short, these laws were, they asserted, an example of overreaching state intrusion, of gross paternalism. Nevertheless, when the courts reviewed these statutes, they were almost never overturned as unconstitutional. A court in Massachusetts noted, “From the moment of the injury, society picks the person up off the highway; delivers him to a municipal hospital and municipal doctors; provides him with unemployment compensation if, after recovery, he cannot replace his lost job; and if the injury causes permanent disability many assure the responsibility for his and his family's continued sustenance. We do not understand a state of mind that permits a plaintiff to think that only he himself is concerned” (Cronin, 1980).
Pure pressure from insurance backers to make that happen.
Guess they are still not as powerful as the tabacco industry....since not one fucking peep about a law using the same idealism and regulation from smoking or chew.
People have been paying into insurance for most of their lives here in America, you threaten to change it into some crazy "pay as you decide" scenario, there will be dead people everywhere, since very few understand that they are hedging a bet against needing the money from insurance.
Everything is corrupt.
No reason machines and technology that has existed for decades to still cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to RENT for your use when you need someone's expertise to operate it....
The whole healthcare/insurance system is fucked and utterly corrupt.
well, UD, there is no good answer. nothing like a conundrum to entertain the synapses. thanks for making me do my calisthenics.I think this is it same guy at least. There is more to read on this.
My neighbors are husband wife doctors and this came up in discussion as well
Anti-vaxxers should forgo ventilators: German doctor – DW – 12/19/2020
A German geneticist has said those who turn down the new COVID-19 vaccine should carry a note also refusing intensive care treatment. He also said medical decisions should not be left to conspiracy theorists.www.dw.com
My wife did.If you worked in health and could opt out of vaccination would you.
My wife did.
If you worked in health and could opt out of vaccination would you.
I actually know several that have. And will not until there is more research and published studies that say it actually works, and there will be no serious side effects.
well, UD, there is no good answer. nothing like a conundrum to entertain the synapses. thanks for making me do my calisthenics.
How and why the court ruled for mandatory helmets.
During the 1970s, pressure by the federal government in the USA led virtually all states to mandate the use of motorcycle helmets (Jones & Bayer, 2007). These statutes provoked the wrath of motorcyclists who asserted that the state deprived them of the right to cycle in the way that was most pleasurable and exciting, and that failure to use helmets posed no threat to others. In short, these laws were, they asserted, an example of overreaching state intrusion, of gross paternalism. Nevertheless, when the courts reviewed these statutes, they were almost never overturned as unconstitutional. A court in Massachusetts noted, “From the moment of the injury, society picks the person up off the highway; delivers him to a municipal hospital and municipal doctors; provides him with unemployment compensation if, after recovery, he cannot replace his lost job; and if the injury causes permanent disability many assure the responsibility for his and his family's continued sustenance. We do not understand a state of mind that permits a plaintiff to think that only he himself is concerned” (Cronin, 1980).
I will be on the news if that is a requirementWell now that a good part of the population is vaccinated. You will now need the government GPS installed in your body so your vitals are traced in real time .
The Pentagon Announces A New Microchip To Implant Into Your Body That Is Designed To Check For And Treat Coronavirus
This is an Orwellian nightmare.conservativebrief.com
I like seeing people without helmets weirdly, reminds me we still live in a wild world where not everyone is a square and people still live on the ragged edge
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think people should be able to ride without them they want, but I always wore one even prior to it being law.
Insurance coverage or no coverage should be incentive enough.
I think helmets on bicycles are ludicrous 10 trillion kids rode them for years with very few problems.
I am pretty certain I also went through that. it was as bad as I could have imagined...truly thought I was gonna die. coughed so hard I blacked out, massive headache, mad pain in arms & legs...likely contracted SARS
Why not. Ant Nancy and her husband just invested 10M in Microsoft last month. What do they know.I feel an overwhelming urge to buy microsoft products.....
I am pretty certain I also went through that. it was as bad as I could have imagined...truly thought I was gonna die. coughed so hard I blacked out, massive headache, mad pain in arms & legs...
The day you eat shit and bounce your melon off the sidewalk with a nasty concussion you mind change yore mind. That shit fucking hurts....and it didn't stop hurting for about 20 hours. Gmac is proof that brain transplants don't work right...I'll do what I can to save the one I've got and recommend the same to friends and family.
my exact same conclusion. that is what makes me advocate for extreme caution in the current problem. I survived it, so it can be done, but damn I do not wish that thing onto anyone.thats when I realized, I could die
my exact same conclusion. that is what makes me advocate for extreme caution in the current problem. I survived it, so it can be done, but damn I do not wish that thing onto anyone.
yes, and then turn that on its head and imagine being 30 yrs old. Not a problem.I have a couple of thoughts
1. I think if I got the same thing being 20 years older my odds of making it are about half what they were.
2. I wonder if its close enough to SARS- COV1 was close enough genetically to SARS COV-2 (19) that I built any immunities to it ?
Thing is there wasnt a reliable test for it in the short time , I had an immunoflourescense assay test that was inconclusive, and PCR tests were a joke back then.
This article is excellent and talks about tobacco as well.
Many good questions are asked and few of the answers make me feel warm and fuzzy.
Where do the individual rights stop and the public right take over and what role does th state play in this?
As a kid I had a steep driveway- I was washing my cr125 as a kid and I was sitting on it moving it around and my downslope foot slipped and I simply fell the long way at 0 miles an hour my head hit the pavement and saw stars for about 10 min likely mild concussion. I cannot imagine hitting your head at high speed.
That said if it means to much to somebody they are willing to risk it I think they should - thing is I also think they should pay the bill for that decision and not me.
You aren't paying the bill, their insurance is. This is the slippery slope we are talking about. Helmets are law in most places even for kids, but you say it is ridiculous for kids to have to wear them? As such are you ok with footing the bill for kids that get injured because they weren't wearing helmets?
And again, it is fine for people to, eat smoke and drink whatever they want for a lifetime, and expect "us" to pay the bill for a lifetime of their unhealthy lifestyle?