rivermobster
Club Banned
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2009
- Messages
- 49,888
- Reaction score
- 40,055
and how would you know???? they started holding back the water before 1983 , 1983 was when they figure out they fucked up,.... or do you think that it all happened the same day...I'm a little different than you,... I don't believe everything some one tells me.... and I don't follow you around and try to prove what you post as false... I don't think I know it all about ever subject,,, what I said, I said it was from what some one told me... I guess you always know more cause you googled it and read it...
Easy turbo...
What's the difference between words on a screen, and words out of somebody's mouth? Nothing. They are just words. Now if you can see for yourself if it's raining, or not, then you can KNOW the truth.
None of us were in the board room when the decisions about the water were made. This is a fact we know.
But...
There is a ton of written documentation on the events that happened over the years. Will any one piece of the puzzle show you the entire puzzle? Nope. This is a fact we also know.
But when you start reading 200 different articles, the pieces of the puzzle slowly start to come together. Here is one I picked up on recently....
The new straw they put in mead. Why did they put it in? Cause when mead goes to dead pool, Vegas will still have water. The new straw made sure of this. Maybe you're going "well duh dumbazz", but I never paid enough attention to care honestly. And, can I go see if the straw is there at this very moment? Nope. Neither can you. So we have to rely on what we've been told. Almost every article will tell you, as Racey said, there is not enough water to go around, if all the allocations are met. He didn't pull that outa his ass, it's been discussed since the 1920's, even before the dam was built, and it still being discussed today! So Vegas, making a decision based on 100+ years of discussions, probably made a good call putting the new straw in place.
So what do we know?
Do they try to imitate the floods that occur naturally? All signs point to yes.
Did that have anything to do with the flood of 1983? All signs point to no.
Are there more water allocations than the river can support? All signs point to yes.
Will the river run out of water eventually? All signs point to no.
Wait, no???
The bureau of reclamation will make sure this never happens. They will do what they have to do to make sure it never happens!! And that will include cutting off the AZ and NV allocations if they absolutely have, to to protect AG and the power the dams produce. I'm sure they will cut CA as well IF that's what is required.
All we can do at this point, is do the rain dances, and hope we have some wet years soon. We can't control mother nature. <- These are facts we know as well.
