pcrussell50
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2011
- Messages
- 182
- Reaction score
- 128
Been spending some time on Colorado recently, and near as I can tell from the locals, the snow, rain, and reservoirs on the west side of the divide, that part that makes the westward flow of the Colorado River, have been above average for the past several years. So much so, that they have either had to, or will have to, release water from their reservoirs because they are full and risk being over full.
Yet Mead still languishes at 1075'ish. Yesterday's LA Times article (maybe it was the day before), I took from that, that since CA is entitled to the lion's share of Colorado River water, and the drought remains persistent, Mead will continue to remain low.
What worries me is, if Western Colorado falls back to normal water levels, or worse, ends up in a drought of it's own, what does that mean for Mead and the lower lakes?
-Peter
Yet Mead still languishes at 1075'ish. Yesterday's LA Times article (maybe it was the day before), I took from that, that since CA is entitled to the lion's share of Colorado River water, and the drought remains persistent, Mead will continue to remain low.
What worries me is, if Western Colorado falls back to normal water levels, or worse, ends up in a drought of it's own, what does that mean for Mead and the lower lakes?
-Peter