• Welcome to River Dave's Place

NY Judge Calling Cops Liars... Interesting Discussion About Ciga Weed

Discussion in 'RD's Lounge' started by t&y, Sep 12, 2019.

Should An Officer Be Able To Detain/Search/Investigate Based On Odor Of A Possible Crime?

  1. Yes

  2. No

  3. Ahhhhh Hellllll Nooooo Craig!

  4. RD Sux

Multiple votes are allowed.
Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. t&y

    t&y Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,637
    Likes Received:
    9,028
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
  2. Mr. C

    Mr. C going back in time

    Messages:
    5,019
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2007
    I know my answer also.:D

    I only ready about the first paragraph
     
  3. Wizard29

    Wizard29 Really a 34 Eliminator

    Messages:
    779
    Likes Received:
    1,028
    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2011
    Absolutely. Get a call about shots fired, go to the house and smell fired powder but not be able to investigate further if the occupants tell you to go away? Doesn't make sense.

    Additional investigation is allowed based on the other senses such as sight or sound...why not smell? For what it's worth, police dogs operate on smell almost exclusively.
     
  4. t&y

    t&y Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,637
    Likes Received:
    9,028
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    It's an interesting read for sure.

    Yeah and that is the big picture here. If you take the politics out of it, and simply look at the basis of what legal standing exists and why, it's pretty clear.
     
    monkeyswrench and LHC30 like this.
  5. Ragged Edge

    Ragged Edge Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    990
    Likes Received:
    675
    Joined:
    May 4, 2011
    Simple answer from me. Yes.
     
  6. CJ_Donahue

    CJ_Donahue Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    621
    Likes Received:
    1,270
    Joined:
    May 24, 2018
    Hell YES. What is next? Can't use what they hear or what they see? What is different about smell?
     
  7. Mr. C

    Mr. C going back in time

    Messages:
    5,019
    Likes Received:
    2,500
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2007
    I'll try to get back to it and read the whole article later.

    But your fooling yourself if you think cops don't abuse the "I smell weed" line. JMHO

    I know label me the cop hater:D:D
     
    LazyLavey likes this.
  8. Yellowboat

    Yellowboat Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    15,312
    Likes Received:
    5,470
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2007
    Yes, the other side of that if the cops are lieing about it to get a search, that should be at least 10 years in jail and a big check going too the victim. Violating some ones rights like that is just wrong.

    I wonder what this liberal judges opinion on the smell of alcohol is? I bet it's the exact opposite of pot.



    Edit, if you did think you smelled pot, an arrest for dui and blood test too confirm would also happen. If you test positive, there is zero argument. If you don't it might get a little bit muddy.
     
  9. ka0tyk

    ka0tyk Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,248
    Likes Received:
    3,142
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    ive been watching a bunch of the "Live PD A&E" on facebook videos and like 9 times out of 10 the cop says he smells an odor and wants to search the car. they consent for some dumb reason and he finds meth, guns, and a whole mess of other stuff.

    at the same time that scares the sh%t out of me because ill be driving down the street with the windows down and someone outside is blowing huge clouds and my car smells like cheech and chongs van. I feel like I could get pulled for something dumb like window tint and get hassled for it.
     
  10. sirbob

    sirbob Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,529
    Likes Received:
    4,594
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Yes they should be able to investigate further if they smell weed...

    However, as was stated in the article by another officer - many of the cops lie and use it as an excuse. Because of this, thy have ruined the ability now to use only smell. I think we are in a place now where smell alone isn't enough. I want to see smell combined with another verifiable clue before they should be able to search.

    Without going into 10 examples - I can see many ways to have the smell of weed present and still not have done anything wrong.
     
    Last edited: Sep 13, 2019
  11. Backlash

    Backlash Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,058
    Likes Received:
    5,322
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2011
    Yes, they should be able to search. Just because a couple of NY's finest say some officers have lied to get a search, doesn't mean all officers lie. There are going to be a few bad apples in EVERY career field, regardless of what people might think.
     
    CJ_Donahue likes this.
  12. Andy B.

    Andy B. Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,777
    Likes Received:
    2,503
    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    This is my stance If a PO wants to search go ahead I have nothing to hide. I was working in Bakersfield and got pulled over officer thought I was drinking it was about 7:00pm I was going back to Taft after my workout I was just exhausted. He asked me if he could search the vehicle I said sure and there is a 380. under the seat not loaded and clip not in the gun(I lived in CO at the time,CO ID, was traveling for work and this was back in 1990) in the case. He said can you grab it for me I said I would rather you do it so he sat me back in the car and pulled it out and everything was in order. When I was leaving he said thanks for obeying,respecting and listening and said next time if your eyes are heavy and head bobbing pull over and take a nap sure thing officer and I was on my way.
     
    CJ_Donahue and buck35 like this.
  13. LargeOrangeFont

    LargeOrangeFont Steers With Throttle

    Messages:
    17,460
    Likes Received:
    20,123
    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2015
    To your point.. if weed is legal in that state, smell should no longer be enough.
     
    Last edited: Sep 13, 2019
    shintoooo and sirbob like this.
  14. Danger Dave

    Danger Dave Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,015
    Likes Received:
    2,831
    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2013
    Before I answer, is flatulence a crime? I mean legally, not what my wife thinks.
     
  15. Lunatic Fringe

    Lunatic Fringe Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,159
    Likes Received:
    3,364
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2010
    It seems like an obvious answer of yes and that is my vote but it could also be there is a need to establish a curb on the possibility of an illegal search based on a subjective sense of smell.
    So, why not make any additional charges contingent on actually finding evidence of marijuana if the odor is the only reason for conducting a search.
    If an illegal weapon or drugs etc is located due to the search but no marijuana evidence is found then confiscate the items but no charges.
     
    highvoltagehands likes this.
  16. Gelcoater

    Gelcoater Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    15,759
    Likes Received:
    16,144
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2009
    Would depend on circumstances wouldn’t it?
    In a car...doesn’t matter. Is still DUI.
    Now, the question there would be did the cop smell weed, or burning weed?
     
  17. 530RL

    530RL Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    12,235
    Likes Received:
    10,029
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2012

    Or if the officer was a city, county, state or federal officer.

    For if he was federal like a park ranger, then it is illegal no matter what.
     
    Gelcoater likes this.
  18. LargeOrangeFont

    LargeOrangeFont Steers With Throttle

    Messages:
    17,460
    Likes Received:
    20,123
    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2015
    Obviously the answer is yes. :)

    I’ve noticed on Live PD they default to “recently burning” weed smell.
     
  19. highvoltagehands

    highvoltagehands Laveycraft Nuera 2750

    Messages:
    1,825
    Likes Received:
    2,107
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2008
    Thats damn good thinking for a Lunatic. Makes sense and offers common ground for both sides of the argument to agree to. Unfortunately there's soo many tangents to this argument that neither side will give in and this argument will continue till the end of time……..
     
  20. highvoltagehands

    highvoltagehands Laveycraft Nuera 2750

    Messages:
    1,825
    Likes Received:
    2,107
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2008
    Thats why Park Rangers "way too long arm of the law" should be limited to Parks….
    Around Folsom Lake, the Cal State park rangers seem to make way more stops outside the park entrances than our local city cops or deputies and Rangers seem to follow way too many violators out of park and onto city or county roads before initiating enforcement stops for DUIs and other stuff that I'm sure could've be done shortly after leaving ramp or on the road out of park? I'm sure many of these roads probably still fall somewhat within Parks legal jurisdiction, but many of these are residential or commercial thoroughfares policed by others.
    Curious what the benefit is for Rangers to police outside the park rather than in it???
     
  21. sirbob

    sirbob Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,529
    Likes Received:
    4,594
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009

    We’ve had a few responses and votes ...

    What say t&y on the subject?:)
     
  22. monkeyswrench

    monkeyswrench Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,194
    Likes Received:
    6,475
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2018
    I guess I'm somewhat oldschool. "Where there's smoke, there's fire"

    I have been detained and my vehicle searched primarily due to type of vehicle, and time driving. Ladder rack on your truck after midnight, or lifted truck with custom paint in the ghetto at night. Usually a BS reason to pull me over, so they could try to get a whiff of my breath. When that didn't work out for them, they'd always ask if they could search my truck. I'd always let them. The main reason was I knew I would run into them again, as my hours were late or super early. Getting lit up once usually meant that cop wouldn't light me up again.

    My youth was different. If something shady was being done, everything else was super legit. Stock appearing car and always parked before midnight. Do your misguided deeds during the afternoon rush and you won't get popped. Seemed to work pretty good:rolleyes:
     
  23. Blackmagic94

    Blackmagic94 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,685
    Likes Received:
    1,729
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2017
    Based on the fact that a scent dog alerts gives PC for a federal agency to do a search without a warrant I will say




    Yes
     
  24. DaveC

    DaveC Car-boat motors

    Messages:
    9,310
    Likes Received:
    2,708
    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Yes. I think so especially if they are gang bangers, parolees or there’s evidence of some other major crime.

    At least where possession is not illegal under state law. (The feds should respect local laws BTW)

    However as the article states sometimes it can be used to justify an illegal search where no weed is actually present. By smelling weed that means it or the paraphernalia is actually present. The smell is unmistakable

    As a compromise if no weed is actually found then that should invalidate the entire search. Seems fair.

    I don’t like being searched so I would never consent to one, as is my right. I never smoke weed or do drugs. (Not judging, just not my thing). So there is 0.0% chance of smelling weed on me or my car. I also keep my Chiba monkey friends out of my car cuz well you know. :p

    That being said I have been told by cops that they smell weed in my car and boat. (Most recent was on Havasu at desert storm) I have also been told I looked wired. (Too much coffee and I talk fast). Neither can be farther from the truth. To be fair I haven’t been searched yet but was close once. Totally unjustified if they did.

    We can of course blame this on the so called bad cops (never anyone here though for sure) ;)

    My view is properly trained cops should be able to tell those that are drunk, high or wired just like experienced street cops can do. It’s so obvious. Might take some time to train but it’s part of the job.
     
    Last edited: Sep 13, 2019
  25. DaveC

    DaveC Car-boat motors

    Messages:
    9,310
    Likes Received:
    2,708
    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    That’s different. Those dogs are amazing. They are so good at what the do and their nose is so much more sensitive than ours.

    My buddy has one. He is the bomb. (The dog not my fat friend)

     
  26. Moneypit

    Moneypit Ol' school kid..........

    Messages:
    1,654
    Likes Received:
    868
    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2007
    I voted yes...
    #1 If an officer is going to use a dog seeking PC, ask the handler exactly how the dog is trained to "alert" before the dog search starts...And don't let the dog scratch the sides of my car with the toenails....
    #2 Not for a long time, but I always refused permission to search based on the idea that I know where my stuff is, after you tear through it I won't know where it is, so no...I have nothing to hide, but no....
    I agree, if the cop says he smells weed and finds none, but finds a questionable gun, the search should be moot, gun taken for safe keeping (to be returned if legal), and no further detainment or arrest... I guess fairness would also exclude any meth, take it, but no charges because no pot was found..Now that pot is legal in some places, even the smell, raw or burnt, is moot...
    Ray
     
  27. Ziggy

    Ziggy SlumLord

    Messages:
    25,786
    Likes Received:
    17,643
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2007
    The phrase is used often it seems, even on Live PD you hear it used regularly. Seen one episode the smell was claimed and the search turned up nothing.
    Cops do need the ability to do their jobs right but if it simply becomes a tool to bypass regulations I call BS.
     
  28. Ballyhoo

    Ballyhoo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    728
    Likes Received:
    827
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    Plain smell doctrine. Look it up for further details.

    Due to the legality of Marijuana in many states, some folks are making arguments against these type of warrant-less searches. There is not a a straight forward perfect answer as every case has its own unique and specific facts.

    Some things to think about regarding warrant-less searches of cars:

    Alcohol is legal in our country. Marijuana is legal in many states but can have restrictions about use in public places, no matter how bad your back hurts. If you are stopped in a car and an officer smells alcohol, he can conduct a warrant-less search of the car to look for the alcohol. Its going to be no different for Marijuana under most circumstances, as DUI for both is the same charge. Its still a crime to drive a motor vehicle while under the influence of Marijuana. The Marijuana might be legal for you to possess, but you can't drive while under the influence of it, just like alcohol.
     
    t&y likes this.
  29. Ballyhoo

    Ballyhoo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    728
    Likes Received:
    827
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    That smell of burnt Marijuana will last for awhile just like tobacco.

    The smell of fresh Marijuana is just as strong, maybe stronger. Years ago we were watching a house that we believed to be a stash pad. A car leaves with two guys in it and we stop it a few miles away. It was cold that night and both occupants were wearing sweaters. The smell of fresh Marijuana on both of the guys was overwhelming. We got a search warrant for the house and found 1k pounds of Marijuana in the house. Smell matters.
     
  30. Ziggy

    Ziggy SlumLord

    Messages:
    25,786
    Likes Received:
    17,643
    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2007
    Oh no I get it. Like I said, you need the ability to do your job. I'm sure the Leo's are correct most of the time but there are times they aren't. I've been there with an employee who was in my car with me.
     
  31. LargeOrangeFont

    LargeOrangeFont Steers With Throttle

    Messages:
    17,460
    Likes Received:
    20,123
    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2015
    What if a passenger is smoking it (probably illegal to drive, but I don't know)? Who is to say what the difference in smell between burnt and unburnt weed is? Yes I get that there is a difference in smell, but these are subjective matters, just like a car exhaust is "too loud".
     
    Ballyhoo likes this.
  32. Gelcoater

    Gelcoater Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    15,759
    Likes Received:
    16,144
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2009
    Anyone with a nose, lol.
    Big difference between burning and just a bag of weed sitting there stinking up the...joint. :D
     
  33. LargeOrangeFont

    LargeOrangeFont Steers With Throttle

    Messages:
    17,460
    Likes Received:
    20,123
    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2015
    Ahh so another thing the cop can pass off with "years of experience and training" ;)
     
  34. TomD

    TomD Breathing Member

    Messages:
    3,471
    Likes Received:
    753
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Somebody hit a skunk? :)
     
  35. t&y

    t&y Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,637
    Likes Received:
    9,028
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    Mine should be obvious. YES, smell of a potential crime should be cause for a legal detention/investigation/search. This is Cop 101. We use all senses when investigating including the odor of something. Most of my traffic stops that last longer than a "Slow Down" advisement include the odor of Marijuana for one very simple reason... the people I'm contacting usually smoke it along with all the other criminal shit they do.

    Smell goes right there with hear, observe, feel in the tool box. That is one of the reasons our windows are always down when on patrol.
     
    monkeyswrench and sirbob like this.
  36. C-2

    C-2 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    8,743
    Likes Received:
    2,935
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Reasonable articulable suspicion, need something more than a hunch or suspicion alone; you must be able to describe your observation.

    My answer is also Yes :eek:
     
    Last edited: Sep 14, 2019 at 1:37 AM
  37. monkeyswrench

    monkeyswrench Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,194
    Likes Received:
    6,475
    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2018
    Damn, I always thought the windows were down from the drive-thru "inspections"
    :p
     
  38. Ballyhoo

    Ballyhoo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    728
    Likes Received:
    827
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    Its very easy to determine the difference in smell between the two. Police officers in most instances will qualify to testify as an expert. There is a short process in court to get to this situation but its not that difficult. Once that occurs the officers word carries much more weight on the subject. As far as car exhaust goes, its not how loud it is, its the fact that its been modified to increase sound. Those are easy battles in court also as long as the cop is prepared.
     
    Last edited: Sep 16, 2019 at 4:46 AM
  39. Ballyhoo

    Ballyhoo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    728
    Likes Received:
    827
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    We are not perfect and we do make mistakes just like anyone else. I appreciate the fact that you understand the challenges law enforcement faces in the ability to do the job. Unfortunately, if you are the driver/owner of the car, you will be responsible in many cases. If you allow your loaded friend/employee in you car and you get stopped by the cops, expect to get searched - legally.
     
  40. RiverDave

    RiverDave In it to win it

    Messages:
    93,321
    Likes Received:
    57,918
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    The fact that both of those can be recorded and one relies solely on testimony from a foulable and sometimes corrupt person?
     
  41. RiverDave

    RiverDave In it to win it

    Messages:
    93,321
    Likes Received:
    57,918
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
    Fuck and No from me..
     
    Mr. C likes this.
  42. RiverDave

    RiverDave In it to win it

    Messages:
    93,321
    Likes Received:
    57,918
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2007
  43. t&y

    t&y Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,637
    Likes Received:
    9,028
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    So you obviously voted RD SUX
     
  44. Yellowboat

    Yellowboat Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    15,312
    Likes Received:
    5,470
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2007
    In my mind that guy has fucked up the public trust so much he should be charged with capital crimes.

    Yes, I want people like that to face the death penalty
     

Share This Page