CLdrinker
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2011
- Messages
- 8,388
- Reaction score
- 16,021
Those who riot should be aborted. Just saying.
Wether you are for or against abortion the court made the correct decision. Roe-v-wade should never have been heard. There is nothing in the constitution about abortion. Back then they should have kicked it back as it is clearly a State issue.
Sounds like a liberal insurrection to me, but I could be wrong.Well, the squad, the DOJ, and the fucking president are doing all they can to whip up violence so we will see I suppose.
Sounds like a liberal insurrection to me, but I could be wrong.
But is it a real protest if they don't wear their vagina costumes AND a pussy hat?I think you are in the minority, at least around here. They are digging out their pink pussy hats as we speak.
Honestly, I don't think it will be riots, but I think there will be demonstrations/protests with a lot of purple hair/pink-pussy-hat-wearing, Liz Warren angry women.
View attachment 1129370
When it became apparent he wasn’t saying he was resigning in the first 5 seconds, I clicked off.Sounds like a liberal insurrection to me, but I could be wrong.
Inner-city stock is not high end like that. How about a 42” Bauhn?Snag me a 70” Samsung would ya?
Inner-city stock is not high end like that. How about a 42” Bauhn?
Pass!
You wanna do lunch?
I’m bored.
I’d be all over that offer But….and I gots a big BUT. LOL. Just ate with the wife and now I have to jump into conference calls until 4pm. You in town next week? I could do it Tue-Th.
And just like that…..Demoncrates recognize female genitalia.
First a pro 2nd amendment ruling then this Rvw ruling.
Haven’t seen Democrats this upset since the Republicans freed their slaves
Be careful, if you look directly at her you will turn to stone.And just like that…..Demoncrates recognize female genitalia.
I have a teenage grandson. Let’s get the together so us adults can go out drinking and run amok!Sure.
I’ll have my teenage grandson for the week but that’s ok.
I’d like to point out the absurd sexism and flippant gender disregard being displayed in this thread, and by extension by every single person commenting including the Supreme Court justices right down to the stupidest protester.
NOT ONE MENTION of the rights of a pregnant man??!!
Are we callously just ignoring their plight now??
Insensitive bastards!!
I don't care either way but I do believe this decision will be interesting academically over time from a social, criminal and economic angle.
Abortion will continue to be readily available, safe and cost effective for the wealthy and upper middle class as they can afford to travel to states which permit abortion and/or will work for companies where the health insurance covers the procedure and travel. The poor and inner cities will have drastically less access, especially in states where it is completely banned and the victim is mandated to carry to term in cases of rape, incest and pedophila.
It will be an interesting social experiment with respect to crime rates in states where it is banned as the households of unwanted children, which there will now be significantly more, may be an incubator for a possible rise in social problems and criminal activity in 15 to 25 years, the peak criminal ages. The crime rates a generation from now in banned states versus allowed states will be interesting data. It will also be interesting to track a rise in social safety net expenditures by the federal government and states that disallow abortion when these unwanted children are now dramatically rising in numbers and must be supported in some fashion.
This may finally put the Donohue-Levitt hypothesis to test.
100% right. The DOJ has no place making a political stance. There are a couple more like the FBI that need to be revamped to take the politics out of their ranks.Presidents definitely have, the office of the president is a political office and it's very common for the President to take political stances with ruling.
However, the Ruling yesterday where the DOJ came out against the SC's NY gun law ruling.... that is a new one to me.
The DOJ is meant to be a neutral force to execute the law, not interpret or make the law. Their job is to prosecute to the extent the law allows, and to the precedents set by appropriate court rulings.
For them to take a political stance against a ruling shows that the agency has run amok of it's reason for existence.
…No you are not alone…Am I the only one that thinks there won’t be any riots or pretty much anything because of this decision?
Where do you think they're going? Doubt it's Best Buy, more like Babies-R-Us. You're getting a two seater baby stroller. Don't whineSnag me a 70” Samsung would ya?
Thumbs up to the Freakanomics post, I was thinking about that this morning.
Something different from 50 years that is not being discussed. Lots of birth control options today that had not been previously available and the access is widespread. (yea I said Widespread He he)
I'm not overly religious but I'm struck with concern that we can openly talk about abortion without any regard for proactive options. There seem so many better ways that people could spend their time regarding unwanted pregnancy than fighting over abortion.
I've done some research in the past that I can't recall the actual data, and I'm too lazy to go look it up. But Abortion levels had fallen pretty steady with exception of the black community. It troubles me that we have massive riots, fundraising, and virtue signaling about Black Lives Matter, but the number of Black deaths attributed to abortion dwarfs all other black murders combined. If Black Lives Matter why not curb abortions in the black community?
If you are a progressive who is pissed off, start lobbying right now for more birth control funding. If you are not doing that, you are full of shit and just want to complain.
The last clinic closed in SD a week or two ago. Currently no abortions there. Time will tell if the state legislature takes up any other circumstances.Which states does one think will impose a TOTAL ban on abortions?
Serious question.
That’s got to be the most bigoted video I have seen in decades. I am absolutely stunned. I mean, sure I joke around about “Anne Dunham should have had an abortion” but actually advocating for eugenics turns my stomach.I don't care either way but I do believe this decision will be interesting academically over time from a social, criminal and economic angle.
Abortion will continue to be readily available, safe and cost effective for the wealthy and upper middle class as they can afford to travel to states which permit abortion and/or will work for companies where the health insurance covers the procedure and travel. The poor and inner cities will have drastically less access, especially in states where it is completely banned and the victim is mandated to carry to term in cases of rape, incest and pedophila.
It will be an interesting social experiment with respect to crime rates in states where it is banned as the households of unwanted children, which there will now be significantly more, may be an incubator for a possible rise in social problems and criminal activity in 15 to 25 years, the peak criminal ages. The crime rates a generation from now in banned states versus allowed states will be interesting data. It will also be interesting to track a rise in social safety net expenditures by the federal government and states that disallow abortion when these unwanted children are now dramatically rising in numbers and must be supported in some fashion.
This may finally put the Donohue-Levitt hypothesis to test.
Don't worry, the end is near. I thought you were Jesuit?I don't care either way but I do believe this decision will be interesting academically over time from a social, criminal and economic angle.
Abortion will continue to be readily available, safe and cost effective for the wealthy and upper middle class as they can afford to travel to states which permit abortion and/or will work for companies where the health insurance covers the procedure and travel. The poor and inner cities will have drastically less access, especially in states where it is completely banned and the victim is mandated to carry to term in cases of rape, incest and pedophila.
It will be an interesting social experiment with respect to crime rates in states where it is banned as the households of unwanted children, which there will now be significantly more, may be an incubator for a possible rise in social problems and criminal activity in 15 to 25 years, the peak criminal ages. The crime rates a generation from now in banned states versus allowed states will be interesting data. It will also be interesting to track a rise in social safety net expenditures by the federal government and states that disallow abortion when these unwanted children are now dramatically rising in numbers and must be supported in some fashion.
This may finally put the Donohue-Levitt hypothesis to test.
As of today, it’s illegal in Kentucky, Louisiana and South Dakota.. 10 more states soon to follow..Which states does one think will impose a TOTAL ban on abortions?
Serious question.
Missouri alreadyWhich states does one think will impose a TOTAL ban on abortions?
Serious question.
As of today, it’s illegal in Kentucky, Louisiana and South Dakota.. 10 more states soon to follow..
Were right here with you buddy. Right here on RDP where we can do it from the comfort of the office. Who needs to work anyway!Riddle me this Who are all these "protesters" on both sides that have nothing better or more important to do then march around bitching ? anyone ?
They don’t care but they do like free shit.Yeah I wonder how many men care about this enough. Maybe those that already had an aborted kid?