H20 Toie
Party on Garth
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2010
- Messages
- 4,451
- Reaction score
- 14,129

Alec Baldwin exclusive: 'The trigger wasn't pulled. I didn't pull the trigger'
George Stephanopoulos' exclusive interview airs Thursday on ABC, streams on Hulu
Typical libturd reaction, "It wasn't me, it was, you know, the thing!"![]()
Alec Baldwin exclusive: 'The trigger wasn't pulled. I didn't pull the trigger'
George Stephanopoulos' exclusive interview airs Thursday on ABC, streams on Huluabcnews.go.com
His lawyer is an idiot and he is a bigger narcasitic asshole than previously thought. Who while under a criminal investigation thinks it is ok to give an interview like this?!
The linked ABC News article identifies the gun as an "antique revolver." Other news media reports have said it's a "Colt revolver."![]()
Alec Baldwin exclusive: 'The trigger wasn't pulled. I didn't pull the trigger'
George Stephanopoulos' exclusive interview airs Thursday on ABC, streams on Huluabcnews.go.com
The linked ABC News article identifies the gun as an "antique revolver." Other news media reports have said it's a "Colt revolver."
Not one source I've seen gets it right. The gun was a F.LLI Pietta Long Colt .45, which is a modern replica of an 1873 Colt Army revolver. They sell for less than $500.
Oh, and Alec...guns don't go off by themselves. Not only that, the Pietta is a single action revolver. It has to be cocked before it will fire.
We are now going to find out how stupid a good portion of the general population is.
His attorney should never have let him do this interview. single action revolver. He's obviously lying.The linked ABC News article identifies the gun as an "antique revolver." Other news media reports have said it's a "Colt revolver."
Not one source I've seen gets it right. The gun was a F.LLI Pietta Long Colt .45, which is a modern replica of an 1873 Colt Army revolver. They sell for less than $500.
Oh, and Alec...guns don't go off by themselves. Not only that, the Pietta is a single action revolver. It has to be cocked before it will fire.
We both pressed send within seconds of one another.
Took me a while to find the model, but fox got it right.
![]()
Alec Baldwin ‘Rust’ shooting: Hollywood weapons armorer explains firearm in question
Questions of who is to blame for the incident have floated since news broke, but Alec Baldwin's fellow stars have spoken out in support of the actor as the investigation continues.www.foxnews.com
He will definitely be charged once the DA figures out WTF really happened. The question is with what crime. Homicide or Manslaughter ?? I would guess that since he was ultimately the last person that should have inspected the weapon and ammo (which appears he failed to do) that his negligence led to this persons death. Legally he should be charged with Murder III.I hope he gets charged and it goes to trial. This interview and in particular, that statement, just essentially cast MASSIVE doubt on any statement he'd made regarding the events prior to and during the incident.
Not to defend any media for getting anything right, but since it's been mentioned twice in this thread that none of them, with the exception of Fox you just mentioned, got it right.
Actually, that very weapon make and model, was reported by every reporting news agency, including Vanity Fair and the Independent in the UK, Oct 27, 28, 29 and Nov 3, depending on which rag on which day. ( If you google that make and model, you'll find more than a page of news agencies that reported it on those dates)
And the only reason I'm mentioning this is because now, for some reason, it's simply being referred to as an "antique revolver", when these same news agencies had reported it's exact description previously ??? New Spin perhaps ??
Have you not seen the people driving around by themselves with a mask on? I think we know which ones are the morons at this point.We are now going to find out how stupid a good portion of the general population is.
He is a professional liar, and you don't have to have any special credentials to see that.Just a few thoughts. First, until I see the complete, unedited interview no one knows for sure what was actually said. Second, he must have a complete idiot for an attorney to allow him to continue to talk about the incident. Third, he may be so narcissistic, arrogant and think he is above the law that he is not taking his attorney's advice to shut up. Fourth, according to what I have read, the info obtained via the warrants seem to contradict his possible story.
Lastly, if I was the investigator, I would subpoena the complete unedited interview to check against his sworn statements and or earlier statements, checking for inconsistencies. Of course, I would have my experts check the tape etc I received to make sure it had not been edited. I would also interview everyone who was involved in the interview, from Stephanopilis to the camera man to everyone on the set and anyone in the chain of custody of the interview. All I can say is what a dumbshit to give such a treasure trove of leads to the prosecution.
Knowing what an ass he is, from his prior issues, I am sure he aggravated someone on the set, who would love to sink his battleship.
Cheers, Steve