WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

Time to Pack the Supreme Court?

SNiC Jet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
8,709
Reaction score
26,347
They say this is only a study.......... 💩 💩 💩

Biden to create bipartisan commission to study expanding the Supreme Court

President Biden is signing an executive order on Friday to establish a commission to conduct a 180-day study on adding seats to the Supreme Court, as well as other potential reforms.
The creation of the bipartisan commission, consisting of Supreme Court experts, fulfills of one of Mr. Biden's key campaign promises to progressives.

*********************************************************

Why the "commission".....bipartisan my ass!......."we" already know the outcome. 🖕:mad:🖕
 

Rye

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2021
Messages
920
Reaction score
382
And to see you guys call him Sleepy Joe. 💪😂
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
40,141
Reaction score
124,201
And to see you guys call him Sleepy Joe. 💪😂

hahaha spoken like a true scumbag.

It’s the only way you nerds can win is by cheating like you did in the election and now because your feelings are hurt and you won’t be able to get shit through. You and your fellow Democrats are world class pieces of shit.

It will be sleepy time soon. 👍
 

Rye

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2021
Messages
920
Reaction score
382
hahaha

It’s the only way you nerds can win is by cheating like you did in the election and now because your feelings are hurt and you won’t be able to get shit through. You and your fellow Democrats are world class pieces of shit.

It will be sleepy time soon. 👍
😂
 

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
40,141
Reaction score
124,201

FA412F4A-4E6D-4D1E-9E65-B97431ECF3BF.jpeg


Little puta game warden. 🖕 😂 🖕
 

HB2Havasu

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2015
Messages
4,433
Reaction score
9,631
Packing the Supreme Court is just one of the Marxist Lefts plan. Once they have a SCOTUS majority they will get rid of the Filibuster to get anything passed thru Congress, and then delete the Constitution as we know it! If they get a majority in SCOTUS you won't recognize the USA in a few years!!!
 
Last edited:

Rye

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2021
Messages
920
Reaction score
382
OK Wise ONE....who is this "whoever" you give your undivided support? 🤷‍♂️
IMO, ....the truth is,...... you have no idea. ;)
You tell me, your post mentions Bidens name 3 times, but you dispute it’s him, I just went along with your statement.
 

SNiC Jet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
8,709
Reaction score
26,347
You tell me, your post mentions Bidens name 3 times, but you dispute it’s him, I just went along with your statement.

Truth is...you admitted "whoever" does exists.......Now you've been caught with your pants down.....
You're fooling no one here but yourself. :cool:
 

Rye

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2021
Messages
920
Reaction score
382
Truth is...you admitted "whoever" does exists.......Now you've been caught with your pants down.....
You're fooling no one here but yourself. :cool:
Man I was just going along with your assertion.
 

SNiC Jet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
8,709
Reaction score
26,347
Man I was just going along with your assertion.

So you are now saying......the man who just claimed that passenger jets will be flying at 21,000 MPH within 10 years....and the man who says he has been serving in Senate for 120 years............and the man who said there was "no vaccine" until he came into office..... you actually believe this man is "calling the shots"?
You best stick to the "whoever" theory because this position is making you appear as a special kind of stupid. :cool:
 

Rye

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2021
Messages
920
Reaction score
382
So you are now saying......the man who just claimed that passenger jets will be flying at 21,000 MPH within 10 years....and the man who says he has been serving in Senate for 120 years............and the man who said there was "no vaccine" until he came into office..... you actually believe this man is "calling the shots"?
You best stick to the "whoever" theory because this position is making you appear as a special kind of stupid. :cool:
Again, go back and read your first post!
 

SNiC Jet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
8,709
Reaction score
26,347
Again, go back and read your first post!

Why? This thread has evolved as all threads do and this one, via help of your foolish comments is proving you out to be a fraud........

So as you struggle......it is your position that the man who just claimed passenger jets will be flying at 21,000 MPH within 10 years....and the man who says he has been serving in Senate for 120 years............and the man who said there was "no vaccine" until he came into office....is the man who is calling the shots.
Got it! ;)
 
Last edited:

Rye

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2021
Messages
920
Reaction score
382
Why? This thread has evolved as all threads do and this one, via help of your foolish comments is proving you out to be a fraud........
Whatever, but your post mentioned Biden 3 times, maybe edit it to “whoever” next time if you aren’t referring to Biden. 🙄
 

SNiC Jet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
8,709
Reaction score
26,347
Whatever, but your post mentioned Biden 3 times, maybe edit it to “whoever” next time if you aren’t referring to Biden. 🙄

Why? "Whoever" was YOUR CLAIM....not mine..... 😂 😂 😂
It's OK if you choose to support a POTUS who can't even remember the name of his Defense Secretary. 😂 😂 😂
 
Last edited:

Rye

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2021
Messages
920
Reaction score
382
Why? "Whoever" was YOUR CLAIM....not mine..... 😂 😂 😂
I said whoever because you said it was not Biden, again I went along with your assertion. Remember it’s your C&P.
 

SNiC Jet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
8,709
Reaction score
26,347
I said whoever because you said it was not Biden, again I went along with your assertion. Remember it’s your C&P.

.....and you are so disconnected and naive you actually believe "Sleepy Joe" is "calling the shots". :cool:

I will say here and now, Biden is NOT calling the shots......he is simply the DNC "front man"....... you simply agreed. And if you do not agree, then you do support the man who just claimed that passenger jets will be flying at 21,000 MPH within 10 years....and the man who says he has been serving in Senate for 120 years............and the man who said there was "no vaccine" until he came into office.......and the first POTUS who can not name his Secretary of Defense.

Evidently you believe there is power and leadership to be found within those with dementia. ;)
 
Last edited:

Rye

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2021
Messages
920
Reaction score
382
I will say here and now, Biden is NOT calling the shots......he is simply the DNC "front man"....... you simply agreed. And if you do not agree, then you do support the man who just claimed that passenger jets will be flying at 21,000 MPH within 10 years....and the man who says he has been serving in Senate for 120 years............and the man who said there was "no vaccine" until he came into office.

Evidently you believe there is power and leadership within dementia. ;)
Whoever 😉
 

Looking Glass

1 = Well = Known = Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2020
Messages
8,290
Reaction score
13,934
Today the "LIB's went Crazy on Supreme Court Justice Breyer, because of his Rejection of Packing The Court, and call for his Retirement. :confused:
 

Fastdadtsmith

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
1,607
Reaction score
3,262
Doesn't this always backfire on the Dems when they change the rules? May be great for them now, but in 4 years they have paved the way for the right to do the same thing. Hypocrite POS's every one of them.
 

SNiC Jet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
8,709
Reaction score
26,347
You all bitched about it enough during the election, why wouldn’t he.

Is this ^^^^^,
A) An excuse
B) An Apology
C) PUI (Posting Under the Influence)
D) All of the above
 
Last edited:

just_floatin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2010
Messages
5,633
Reaction score
17,919
The enemy in plain site, some hiding behind their fire walls stirring the pot thinking this is a game and funny......until it’s not.
 

94Nautique

Once Banned
Joined
Jul 22, 2010
Messages
12,306
Reaction score
25,589
They say this is only a study.......... 💩 💩 💩

Biden to create bipartisan commission to study expanding the Supreme Court

President Biden is signing an executive order on Friday to establish a commission to conduct a 180-day study on adding seats to the Supreme Court, as well as other potential reforms.
The creation of the bipartisan commission, consisting of Supreme Court experts, fulfills of one of Mr. Biden's key campaign promises to progressives.

*********************************************************

Why the "commission".....bipartisan my ass!......."we" already know the outcome. 🖕:mad:🖕
BI partisan? So it’s a partisan group, that has BI democrats.

fuck democrats
 

HB2Havasu

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2015
Messages
4,433
Reaction score
9,631
Doesn't this always backfire on the Dems when they change the rules? May be great for them now, but in 4 years they have paved the way for the right to do the same thing. Hypocrite POS's every one of them.
Not if they get their way this time. You will only have 1 Party system, and they know it. The Socialist Democratic Party will be your only choice. They need to be stopped!!!
 

HB2Havasu

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2015
Messages
4,433
Reaction score
9,631
Today the "LIB's went Crazy on Supreme Court Justice Breyer, because of his Rejection of Packing The Court, and call for his Retirement. :confused:
That’s the Lefts game plan now. If you dont agree with them they will Cancel you. Even if your on their side. They require 100% compliance. It’s much like the 3rd Reich was in the 1930’s
 

Christopher Lucero

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2018
Messages
1,590
Reaction score
1,080
The commission will likely decide it is not worth the trouble. SCOTUS itself will have some serious thought to ponder, not because of individual ideology, but because their position as jurists is being manipulated and burdened by the exec branch overtly in every election cycle...been ongoing for 20 years now. On one hand, more justices will 'share out the burden' more broadly, on the other...will it? the election lawsuits by both parties in elections ...whether by victors or losers... has to stop.
SCOTUS kept the responses in our last cycle terse, to avoid their impartiality, but the execs keep hounding them.
 

Attachments

  • 120820zr_bq7d.pdf
    20.5 KB · Views: 25
  • 121120zr_p860.pdf
    41.1 KB · Views: 22
Last edited:

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
40,141
Reaction score
124,201
The commission will likely decide it is not worth the trouble. SCOTUS itself will have some serious thought to ponder, not because of individual ideology, but because their position as legislative body is being manipulated and burdened by the exec branch overtly in every election cycle...been ongoing for 20 years now. On one hand, more justices will 'share out the burden' more broadly, on the other...will it? the election lawsuits by both parties in elections ...whether by victors or losers... has to stop.
SCOTUS kept the responses in our last cycle terse, to avoid their impartiality, but the execs keep hounding them.

Yea those election concerns need to stop because Sec. of States and Governors should be able to change election laws in blatant disregard of their State Constitution. And if State courts packed with the offending party say it’s all good, by golly that’s just the way it is!!!

Really Chris? 😂
 

HB2Havasu

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2015
Messages
4,433
Reaction score
9,631
The commission will likely decide it is not worth the trouble. SCOTUS itself will have some serious thought to ponder, not because of individual ideology, but because their position as legislative body is being manipulated and burdened by the exec branch overtly in every election cycle...been ongoing for 20 years now. On one hand, more justices will 'share out the burden' more broadly, on the other...will it? the election lawsuits by both parties in elections ...whether by victors or losers... has to stop.
SCOTUS kept the responses in our last cycle terse, to avoid their impartiality, but the execs keep hounding them.
Haha - You think they’re just going to say oh never mind huh, lol. Keep in mind the dipshit that Jao appointed to lead this panel is a trained Marxist. I hope your right, but I doubt they are going to do anything besides recommending adding 4 or 5 seats to the court and initiate term limits to get rid of the remaining conservative SCOTUS judges. It’s in their manifesto to dominate all branches of government.
 

RodnJen

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
10,643
Reaction score
6,044
It is a big list.

“When the White House released the list of commission members on Friday, it swiftly won praise — from members of the conservative Federalist Society. Evan Bernick, a right-libertarian law professor at Georgetown, praised the commission as a “powerhouse lineup of scholars.” Stephen Sachs, a Duke Law professor who won the Federalist Society’s Joseph Story Award in 2020, called the commission “an astonishingly well-balanced list.”
 
Top