WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

Well if that don't beat all.

Andy B.

Andy B.

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
5,377
Reaction score
7,320
Let the sheep keep getting the shot and boosted less idiots on the planet. Can't fix stupid!!!!
Come to think of it I don't want to fix the stupid!!
 
rmarion

rmarion

Stop The Steal
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
12,040
Reaction score
28,490
20221128_201335.jpg
 
t&y

t&y

t&y
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
15,710
Reaction score
27,655
Absolutes like he states generally do not end well for the professor of said absolutes.
 
v6toy4x

v6toy4x

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2019
Messages
2,485
Reaction score
3,795
I have one serious question on Ivermectin, not trolling, if Ivermectin is truly as good as everyone thinks why would Merck, ranked 87th on forbes global 2000, not spend a 100 million to rebrand, remarket, boost production of an existing product already on their shelf bringing the next best thing since sliced bread to the market, literally overnight? They could have made 100s of BILLIONS if not more, not to mention lives saved? That is what they do after all.

Instead they cut a deal with the feds for a measly 1.2 billion for 1.7 million doses of Molnupiravir, why would they do that and not push Ivermectin?

It makes no sense. IMO use whatever you want, Ivermectin, drink a little Lysol, not my concern its your body.
However, my logic says it doesn't work, Merck is way smarter than that, no??

It just makes me pause and wonder that's all, or should I dump some spare change into MRK!🤔

Carry on
 
mjc

mjc

Retired Neighbor
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
11,807
Reaction score
8,830
v6toy4x said:
I have one serious question on Ivermectin, not trolling, if Ivermectin is truly as good as everyone thinks why would Merck, ranked 87th on forbes global 2000, not spend a 100 million to rebrand, remarket, boost production of an existing product already on their shelf bringing the next best thing since sliced bread to the market, literally overnight? They could have made 100s of BILLIONS if not more, not to mention lives saved? That is what they do after all.

Instead they cut a deal with the feds for a measly 1.2 billion for 1.7 million doses of Molnupiravir, why would they do that and not push Ivermectin?

It makes no sense. IMO use whatever you want, Ivermectin, drink a little Lysol, not my concern its your body.
However, my logic says it doesn't work, Merck is way smarter than that, no??

It just makes me pause and wonder that's all, or should I dump some spare change into MRK!🤔

Carry on
Click to expand...
They do make lots of it. It is on the list of essential medicines according to WHO. It is a Nobel prize winning medicine. So it is everywhere just not for that so called unapproved use. I took it when I got earlier this year.
 
v6toy4x

v6toy4x

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2019
Messages
2,485
Reaction score
3,795
mjc said:
They do make lots of it. It is on the list of essential medicines according to WHO. It is a Nobel prize winning medicine. So it is everywhere just not for that so called unapproved use. I took it when I got earlier this year.
Click to expand...
I am all for it being a huge help, that would be great, we are all getting tired of this situation. But if Merck is letting the cash cow slip by, something just does not add up?? They must know something everyone else doesn't??? I know if I was a shareholder I would be wondering WTF!
 
v6toy4x

v6toy4x

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2019
Messages
2,485
Reaction score
3,795
jeepdog said:
More money in the faucci ouchie
Click to expand...
NO WAY! a true treatment would produce a much greater revenue stream, not even close. All Merck would have to do is rename, repackage and remarket, basically overnight. Doesn't add up, period.
 
500bbc

500bbc

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
26,492
Reaction score
40,390
v6toy4x said:
I am all for it being a huge help, that would be great, we are all getting tired of this situation. But if Merck is letting the cash cow slip by, something just does not add up?? They must know something everyone else doesn't??? I know if I was a shareholder I would be wondering WTF!
Click to expand...
It's already available generic.
 
v6toy4x

v6toy4x

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2019
Messages
2,485
Reaction score
3,795
500bbc said:
It's already available generic.
Click to expand...
Not sure why that would stop merck or anyone manufacturing it to not say "hey everyone we have a treatment for covid that will save countless lives, its already on the shelf and can be distributed tomorrow" yet not one manufacturer is willing to make that claim, and reap the financial wind fall? not to mention actually help people?

Makes no sense and quite frankly doesnt ring true, IMO, of course to each their own.
 
regor

regor

Tormenting libturds
Joined
May 28, 2010
Messages
40,368
Reaction score
125,221
v6toy4x said:
Not sure why that would stop merck or anyone manufacturing it to not say "hey everyone we have a treatment for covid that will save countless lives, its already on the shelf and can be distributed tomorrow" yet not one manufacturer is willing to make that claim, and reap the financial wind fall? not to mention actually help people?

Makes no sense and quite frankly doesnt ring true, IMO, of course to each their own.
Click to expand...

When you understand why they attacked it so aggressively, the answer will be right in front of you.

Merck doesn’t have to balls to push it and go against the Pharma Cabal.

Nobody wants to be Barry and Honey Sherman’d.

www.independent.co.uk

Everything we know about the murders of billionaires Barry and Honey Sherman

The double murder remains unsolved four years later
www.independent.co.uk www.independent.co.uk
 
LargeOrangeFont

LargeOrangeFont

We aren't happy until you aren't happy
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
49,690
Reaction score
76,155
v6toy4x said:
Not sure why that would stop merck or anyone manufacturing it to not say "hey everyone we have a treatment for covid that will save countless lives, its already on the shelf and can be distributed tomorrow" yet not one manufacturer is willing to make that claim, and reap the financial wind fall? not to mention actually help people?

Makes no sense and quite frankly doesnt ring true, IMO, of course to each their own.
Click to expand...

Makes perfect sense when you look at the cost per dose of the “vaccines” they want you to take 4x per year and they have a near monopoly on them.
 
v6toy4x

v6toy4x

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2019
Messages
2,485
Reaction score
3,795
LargeOrangeFont said:
Makes perfect sense when you look at the cost per dose of the “vaccines” they want you to take 4x per year and they have a near monopoly on them.
Click to expand...
The vaccine does not treat the after infection, right? And I am pretty sure Merck is not in the vaccine game so why not jump into the treatment side?
I dont believe for one minute that if merck had any real credible efficacy testing they would not be pushing this hard yet to the contrary. Having the smoking gun cure and not producing it would be like RG saying I have this great UTV design but dont want to produce it because I would rather make repair parts for the other brands!

Merck is in fact pushing a completely different treatment drug, after giving up on vaccine, so again why not also push Ivermectin, its a legitimate question, most definitely a pause moment.
 
Last edited:
Danger Dave

Danger Dave

Sarcastically Optimistic 😁
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
14,348
Reaction score
39,361
4Waters said:
Any links to and article
Click to expand...
Well strangely enough nothing on CNN.

ussanews.com

‘Whatever happened to Pfizer’s covid vaccine trial in pregnant women?’ I wish to let you women know, FDA recommended this mRNA gene injection with no (ZERO) DATA, none & won’t study it; why?

Pfizer stopped the trial with only about 350 of an intended 4000 women because they know it will show the shot to be deadly in pregnant women. I invite Pfizer to sue me. Let us get into that neat issue called ‘discovery’. I share this piece by Maryanne for I think it is well written
ussanews.com ussanews.com

www.theepochtimes.com

Pfizer's COVID-19 Vaccine Linked to Blood Clotting: FDA

www.theepochtimes.com www.theepochtimes.com
 
4Waters

4Waters

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2016
Messages
30,536
Reaction score
76,018
Danger Dave said:
Well strangely enough nothing on CNN.

ussanews.com

‘Whatever happened to Pfizer’s covid vaccine trial in pregnant women?’ I wish to let you women know, FDA recommended this mRNA gene injection with no (ZERO) DATA, none & won’t study it; why?

Pfizer stopped the trial with only about 350 of an intended 4000 women because they know it will show the shot to be deadly in pregnant women. I invite Pfizer to sue me. Let us get into that neat issue called ‘discovery’. I share this piece by Maryanne for I think it is well written
ussanews.com ussanews.com

www.theepochtimes.com

Pfizer's COVID-19 Vaccine Linked to Blood Clotting: FDA

www.theepochtimes.com www.theepochtimes.com
Click to expand...
Another conspiracy theory that is true, weird
 
Mini Kat

Mini Kat

Hammer Makin' Payments
Joined
Aug 20, 2009
Messages
6,662
Reaction score
2,912
Yep it keeps leading right back to the money train. No thank you can have mine
 

Attachments

  • FB_IMG_1644527755508.jpg
    FB_IMG_1644527755508.jpg
    53 KB · Views: 32
  • FB_IMG_1639363173353.jpg
    FB_IMG_1639363173353.jpg
    58.2 KB · Views: 31
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top