LargeOrangeFont
We aren't happy until you aren't happy
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2015
- Messages
- 49,690
- Reaction score
- 76,155
We have people on every level of the spectrum here. From those that think this whole thing is 100% a hoax, to those that want everyone boarded up in their homes for 18 months.
I've had a few conversations over PMs with members and would like to start a discussion about what you personally would need to see to feel it is safe to begin a transition back to normalcy. I don't mean everything going back to the way it was in Feb, I mean starting the transition. This would be small business opening up with limited/curbside/pickup services, Restaurants opening back up in a reduced and social distanced capacity, gatherings of 10 or less, things of that nature.
As a follow up to that I am wondering why you think it is any safer at that point as the virus is still out there? Or is it just because the economic risks now outweigh the risks of the virus?
I'm going to pick on @RiverDave because it is your website and he is a good example -
Dave, you mostly stayed home, It was not a full quarantine, but you and your family kept mostly to yourselves and your storefront closed. Your storefront is now open and you have mentioned you want to maintain social distance, etc.. There is obviously still risk of getting sick, but what was your thought process in doing this? What moved the needle for you?
Hopefully this does not turn into a shit show, as we are not going to convince others one way or another at this point. I'm actually interested in what others think about this.
As for me I think we should and could start that transition in most areas of the Southwest US on May 1. I think it is pretty clear that the virus is far less dangerous that originally thought. Obviously the risk of getting sick still exists, but the economic and social risks are far greater, and I believe we can do a better job if we focus on protecting those that are vulnerable to dying from the disease, instead of trying to keep everyone locked up in their houses.
I've had a few conversations over PMs with members and would like to start a discussion about what you personally would need to see to feel it is safe to begin a transition back to normalcy. I don't mean everything going back to the way it was in Feb, I mean starting the transition. This would be small business opening up with limited/curbside/pickup services, Restaurants opening back up in a reduced and social distanced capacity, gatherings of 10 or less, things of that nature.
As a follow up to that I am wondering why you think it is any safer at that point as the virus is still out there? Or is it just because the economic risks now outweigh the risks of the virus?
I'm going to pick on @RiverDave because it is your website and he is a good example -
Dave, you mostly stayed home, It was not a full quarantine, but you and your family kept mostly to yourselves and your storefront closed. Your storefront is now open and you have mentioned you want to maintain social distance, etc.. There is obviously still risk of getting sick, but what was your thought process in doing this? What moved the needle for you?
Hopefully this does not turn into a shit show, as we are not going to convince others one way or another at this point. I'm actually interested in what others think about this.
As for me I think we should and could start that transition in most areas of the Southwest US on May 1. I think it is pretty clear that the virus is far less dangerous that originally thought. Obviously the risk of getting sick still exists, but the economic and social risks are far greater, and I believe we can do a better job if we focus on protecting those that are vulnerable to dying from the disease, instead of trying to keep everyone locked up in their houses.
Last edited: