10:1 it was someone there, or associated with them(delivery person, ex-employee or family member) With unsecured entrances they were committing multiple other violations as well. Heads should roll, but who knows if the will
It's not gone, just not sanctioned in polite society...but society has lost it's way.
So far only ex employee's that have left in the last year came forward, so they weren't there to watch her go to term. Who knows they may have left over this situation.
I haven't seen video taken in patient's rooms unless it was sleep study or psychiatric. I have seen a couple ICU's that had monitors at the nurses station, but I don't know if they recorded.
This thread hits a Huge fucking nerve in me. AZ is closed as far as holding people responsible for institutions put in charge of our Family members.
Could be religious reasons, it could have been somebody's baby girl. There are so many different states of comatose, partially, or vegetative states are different than on life support. When you've seen the look that I'm thinking of, eyes almost alive...but not quite there. The body can live, and the mind gone, or almost gone.
I had to make the call to pull the plug on my mother. I was 34, she was 61, great relationship, yada, yada,....... I'd do it again tomorrow. Life in that state has no quality to anyone, and nobody should have to live like that.
You and I, and our mothers, were identical ages. That's all kinds of fuckered up!
That's way too easy...and quick. Some things call for creativity and a little extra time.
Let it go tribal.Heads will roll.
From what the news has said, the baby is in good health, and in the custody of the comatose woman's family. Their statement was much to the point that they are disgusted by the circumstance, but the baby is still loved.
If I might ask, how do you have what appears to be inside information? Just curious....
Sometimes it may be in his best interest not to answer...especially if it is somehow related to employment.
Gotcha. Thanks
Not necessarily, the whole time I was reading the article I kept thinking, "they wouldn't get my DNA". I mean if I didn't do shit and they had no real evidence that I might have short of the fact I have a dick, then I shouldn't have to give up my privacy. But that's just me.
I would think the DA would have an idea of who, and then get a warrant for such for samples from those people only. Not to be polite to others, but to cover their ass from suits. At least that's what they did on Law and Order
The article said they're getting samples from all male employees. Not sure if they're limiting it to those that identify as male or if they're going to collect from all biological males.I would think the DA would have an idea of who, and then get a warrant for such for samples from those people only. Not to be polite to others, but to cover their ass from suits. At least that's what they did on Law and Order
If that's the case...Yes, they'd need to get a court order for mine as well. If I were being accused of something this bad, and was innocent, I would make it difficult for them. If they couldn't find any other evidence to somehow implicate me, it would be difficult to convince a judge of a court order. People may not agree and say you are hiding something. What happens to "Innocent until proven guilty"? If the DNA is to prove your innocence, would it not also be assuming you were guilty previous to the test?
Based on what's in that article this place should be closed. And the government agencies inspecting and watching over the place need to be investigated. This deal goes beyond this latest incident.
I would be first in line to give my DNA. I don't know anyone that would want to be implecated in any way shape or form. Not to mention if you said no, that would more than likely be grounds for the warrant to take it.
