Done-it-again
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2016
- Messages
- 10,308
- Reaction score
- 13,326
It’s not as simple as Splashing a hull. If this was say Howard splashing the hull and changed the top making it a howard, then so be it.
With the purchase of Hallett , included anything and everything Hallett. Not just the molds that existed.
The problem I see is Jerry would have been spanked introducing the 242 attempting to steal back the business his family sold. Now the “partners” introduce as if they have the rights to it, they all had Barron HIN so Barron is Hallett, Hallett is Barron. Not so once company is sold.
If they want Hallett back then buy it, simple as that. Hell they would increase sales, have real boats to offer, and very likely out pace hallett sales under Davis. Win win for all.
Marketing it as legend returns,teak floors we are known for, the list goes on, are all known as hallett specific. And then stumble on your own words saying 242 Hall… uh I messed up, not even attempting to create your own
Anyone defending Barron on this has clearly never owned or sold a business.
Let’s say In n Out purchased original Tommy’s. Both well known companies. Now under one parent company. It’s a I don’t care, I love it, I hate it situation. Years pass and in n out says hey if your interested we would entertain selling Tommy’s.
Meantime the son starts a company and calls it original Tommy’s 2.0 and duplicates marketing of parents business and basically saying we’re back! ya think in n out should just be like that’s cool good luck.
All good points. But the 240 was a defunct model and Davis had plenty of opportunities to bring the model back under the Hallett name. It wasn’t like it was still available form Davis and they copied it, therefore I don’t see an issue.
Perhaps the marketing could have been better and need to get rid of the guy on the video, sounded like an idiot.