WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

Boat Hits Brooklyn Bridge

HTTP404

New But Seasoned Inmate #2002
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
4,192
Reaction score
8,197
Wouldn't the current be running the other direction? Out to sea instead of up river?
 

RiverDave

In it to win it
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Messages
127,471
Reaction score
169,105
From what i read and saw on another video, lost power they are actually floating backwards with a tug trying to chase them down.

There is videos showing that there was a ton of people standing up in the rigging..

I had assumed they had all climbed down before the incident..

Apparently they were still up there




You gotta be extra special to be up in the top of the masts and literally see a bridge coming and try to ride it out? WTF?


RD
 

BoatCop

Retired And Loving It.
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
5,625
Reaction score
10,712
Wouldn't the current be running the other direction? Out to sea instead of up river?
Tidal surge. Although it's technically a "river", as it's attached, unhindered, to the ocean, the tides provide an "artificial" river current. Inland as the tides comes in, and seaward as the tides goes out.

In Philly, we always timed our departure to Cape May to coincide with the tide going out. And return on the incoming tide. Our 65' Tug had a top speed at around 12 knots. Put that up against a 8-10 knot current, and it would take us days, instead of hours, to make the trip.
 

BoatCop

Retired And Loving It.
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
5,625
Reaction score
10,712
There is videos showing that there was a ton of people standing up in the rigging..

I had assumed they had all climbed down before the incident..

Apparently they were still up there




You gotta be extra special to be up in the top of the masts and literally see a bridge coming and try to ride it out? WTF?


RD

Check Post #46.
 

boatnam2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
14,272
Reaction score
8,113
You can actually see one of the guys standing on the tallest mast when hits and breaks he swings down and hangs on for a second before falling to ship, pretty sure he would be one of the ones who died.
 

BoatCop

Retired And Loving It.
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
5,625
Reaction score
10,712
You can actually see one of the guys standing on the tallest mast when hits and breaks he swings down and hangs on for a second before falling to ship, pretty sure he would be one of the ones who died.

Reports I have read, say the deaths were from parts of the mast(s) falling onto people on the decks. Those guys tethered up to the rigging were the lucky ones.
 

boatnam2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
14,272
Reaction score
8,113
Reports I have read, say the deaths were from parts of the mast(s) falling onto people on the decks. Those guys tethered up to the rigging were the lucky ones.
Yea this was a video, maybe he just swung lower and didn't fall.
 

boatnam2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
14,272
Reaction score
8,113
Pretty sure that is a person falling on last hit.
 

boatnam2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
14,272
Reaction score
8,113
I take that back it wasn't the last mast, one before it.
 

BoatCop

Retired And Loving It.
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
5,625
Reaction score
10,712
Fun Fact:

The Cuauhtémoc, (Mexico's Tall Ship) and 3 of her sister ships, were built in Spain in 1982, based off the blueprints/plans that built the Horst Wessel (current USCGC Barque Eagle). The ships are pretty much identical.

TS.jpg
 

NicPaus

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
15,318
Reaction score
17,468
Fun Fact:

The Cuauhtémoc, (Mexico's Tall Ship) and 3 of her sister ships, were built in Spain in 1982, based off the blueprints/plans that built the Horst Wessel (current USCGC Barque Eagle). The ships are pretty much identical.

View attachment 1507585
What did they cost to build then? Compared to building the same now?
 

QC22

Landing Loser
Joined
May 14, 2018
Messages
2,205
Reaction score
3,438
It does sound now like no power. Crazy combination of Murphy stuff here:

Tide coming in, meeting the river current right at the bridge? Everybody standing on the masts (spars?) for a spectacle/demonstration dealio, mast height just above bridge height. If it can happen, it will happen. I can’t imagine the scene they must’ve all had to deal with.
 

BoatCop

Retired And Loving It.
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
5,625
Reaction score
10,712
What did they cost to build then? Compared to building the same now?
Couldn't tell you. Didn't cost US anything to get the Eagle, (except retro fit).

It'll cost a pretty penny to repair the damage, especially if they do the repairs in New York. I would have it towed to Baltimore and contract with the Coast Guard Yard do the repairs. That's where they do all the Eagle maintenance, so they have experience with that design and model of ship. Either that, or they'll tow it back to Mexico.
 

ChumpChange

Commercial Banker
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
11,014
Reaction score
14,238
It'll cost a pretty penny to repair the damage, especially if they do the repairs in New York.
If any repairs are done in New York then the ship would have to be retro fitted to current environmental standards. That means they would have to take all the sails down and make it an electric ship.
 

stephenkatsea

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
8,988
Reaction score
13,632
Tidal surge. Although it's technically a "river", as it's attached, unhindered, to the ocean, the tides provide an "artificial" river current. Inland as the tides comes in, and seaward as the tides goes out.

In Philly, we always timed our departure to Cape May to coincide with the tide going out. And return on the incoming tide. Our 65' Tug had a top speed at around 12 knots. Put that up against a 8-10 knot current, and it would take us days, instead of hours, to make the trip.
We also timed our arrivals and departures in upper Charleston SC with the tides. And we had 2 main engines and a bow thruster. The Captain of the Mexican vessel will carry this with him for the rest of his life. He didn’t do anything wrong. But, he didn’t do everything right. One look at those conditions and thinking about the “what if’s”, a line already attached to just one tug would have prevented this.
 

BoatCop

Retired And Loving It.
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
5,625
Reaction score
10,712
We also timed our arrivals and departures in upper Charleston SC with the tides. And we had 2 main engines and a bow thruster. The Captain of the Mexican vessel will carry this with him for the rest of his life. He didn’t do anything wrong. But, he didn’t do everything right. One look at those conditions and thinking about the “what if’s”, a line already attached to just one tug would have prevented this.
Ditto.

But I was never on a ship that required a tug. (last "big" ship was in '86). I remember my CO, on the 378' Cutter out of Hono, would get on the horn and yell at the tugs to: "Get the fuck away from my ship!" He'd go as far as to have a stool on the bridgewing for the pilot. He told hm to just sit there, and if he saw anything out of the ordinary to speak up, but otherwise, just sit there, STFU and enjoy the ride. Even the Ice Breaker in foreign ports, we'd never need a tug. Now I see them using tugs to help 210's dock.

Tug assist may now be "required" in certain ports for certain sized/outfitted ships. But I never had a CO that needed one.

(I will admit that we once had to use our small boat as a tug to dock our 65' Harbor tug, mooring on the Cohansey River in South Jersey in about 50 MPH winds.)
 

beerrun

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 25, 2010
Messages
5,054
Reaction score
10,460
Boatcop back in our coast guard days we went out when the call came in now days the call comes in the boat crew musters and they discuss weather its safe for them to go out its a different coast guard today
 

QC22

Landing Loser
Joined
May 14, 2018
Messages
2,205
Reaction score
3,438
Just read that she pulled away from her berth at 8:20PM with a tug, radioed for help from additional tugs at 8:24, hit the bridge 45 seconds later. Was stopped at 8:27. Wow!

 

stephenkatsea

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
8,988
Reaction score
13,632
Pretty good explanation and pictures here:

This guy does a good job. I’ve seen him cover prior maritime incidents. Unfortunately, the graphic depiction shows the vessel spinning around and leaving the dock bow first. That didn’t happen. Docking Pilot? I believe there would have been a Docking Pilot onboard. The Captain is in charge, but typically the Docking Pilot instructs the tugs. The Captain can over ride his commands. The docking tug would have received instructions from the pilot as approved by the captain. In any case the tug was released, did not have a line on the vessel or remain in physical contact. Pre departure tests - verifying the fwd and rev function of the eng(s), gear box(s), and controls. Steering is also check by conducting hardovers then returning to midships. This is, or should be, standard procedure on any ship. It can become boring and redundant, but it is necessary and it works. Perhaps checks were completed and a mechanical failure occurred after the checks. Wind and current. There is always more ship below the water than there is above. The current is almost always the boss over the wind. If they are from the same directions the forces match and move the vessel accordingly. In this case, stern first into the Brooklyn Bridge.

There was mention of Diplomatic Immunity - I don’t believe required pilotage can be refused via diplomatic immunity.
 

Orange Juice

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
6,167
Reaction score
7,278
Just another Site Six boat launch recovery video. Nothing to see. 😞
 

BoatCop

Retired And Loving It.
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
5,625
Reaction score
10,712
Just another Site Six boat launch recovery video. Nothing to see. 😞

Those days are gone, since they re-did the Site-Six ramp. Not as steep, better traction 'crete, and a flatter approach.
 

Badchoices03

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2018
Messages
3,611
Reaction score
8,741
I am really impressed that for the most part everyone on this post is accepting this as just and accident cause shit happens sometimes....rather than how normal posts like these go where people are claiming it was 100% intentional and should be considered an attack....
 

BabyRay

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
3,237
I just read on X that somebody took over the ship’s systems remotely. Apparently, it was a test of a foreign country’s (China?) system in preparation for war. Instead of wasting missiles, they intend to just cause our ships to crash into each other. It’ll be like watching the Keystone Cops!

I am really impressed that for the most part everyone on this post is accepting this as just and accident cause shit happens sometimes....rather than how normal posts like these go where people are claiming it was 100% intentional and should be considered an attack....

Does that work?
 

BoatCop

Retired And Loving It.
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
5,625
Reaction score
10,712
I just read on X that somebody took over the ship’s systems remotely. Apparently, it was a test of a foreign country’s (China?) system in preparation for war. Instead of wasting missiles, they intend to just cause our ships to crash into each other. It’ll be like watching the Keystone Cops!



Does that work?
No.
 
Top