Uncle Dave
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2008
- Messages
- 10,184
- Reaction score
- 11,398
Yes stealing - when you force a (NEW) homeowner to put up panels AND contract any surplus output to you at a cost way below what you charge him for the same thing - like all new home owners are forced to.Stealing? Fat profit? There's so much daytime excess solar capacity in California, its utilities are paying utility providers in Arizona, New Mexico, Oregon, and Washington millions of dollars to take it.
The daytime megawatt hour price in Southern California is often negative.
![]()
California is paying other states to take its solar energy
California has been paying utilities in other states to take its surplus electricity to avoid grid overload according to a report.www.newsweek.com
The Lawrence report has been accompanied by several others, including one by the CPUC, that the NEM scheme is responsible for California's high electrical energy costs. It's just who you wish to believe.
I'd call that theft.
Which nem scheme is responsible? Nem1? Not enough of them if you do the math, and the panels sold under 1 are small and almost all output is basically consumed on site.
Nem 2? They pay grid maintenance fees like everyone else does as well as supply the bulk of the daytime power to the grid at a huge discount compared to rotational power.
My power isnt worth anything to you? Fine let me off the grid.
Last edited: