Gasnsuntanlotion
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2015
- Messages
- 367
- Reaction score
- 143
Curious if any one has a new composite rage? How does it compare to a Howard 25 bullet? Ride, speed, cruddy ect... they look awesome.
Just curious. Not tryin to stir things. Lol. I almost bought a Rage but heard so many good things about the bullet, I decided to look for one instead. There haven't been any new reviews of the Rage that I know of.
I believe RD has a boat test article for the Nordic Rage he did last year, but he has not published it yet!:rolleyes
Stand corrected, older Rages had 20*. BTW the ad you posted says 22.5* deadrise in the specifications!
Those are Howard's specs at the bottom I think.
So their hulls are very similar, they both weigh about the same, they would be extremely close in speed with 540 I assume
Pick your fave
Agreed. Now shave off 500lbs or so for the full Carbon Kevlar available on the Nordic and it should be faster than the Howard with the same power.
I have a the same boat but a 2001, how are you getting 75mph? I have not seen over 71 and that is near empty and in December. Prop?I have a 2005 Rage and it's an amazing boat. Mine has wood but not a lot. I don't think the performance or quality would be very different between my boat and a brand new one with similar power (425 hp for my 496 HO). I'm super happy with my rage. With half tanks a fuel and a couple of folks I can run 70-75 without any stress with regard to stability. I spend a lot of time going 20 mph towing kids on a wakeboard or skiing. That's really why I went with the rage instead of the heat. Great manners around the dock. Here's the caveat... I've been in rough water a few times and the boat still feels very safe... Got in a bad situation in a big storm with my five kids and it was super solid but, in rougher water, the kind that is common in Havasu, I won't run hard. It's just to hard on the passengers and the boat. In the next few years I'll be moving to a closed bow and the Heat and the Bullet are in consideration because I want to go to bigger water and have a cabin for the occasional overnight. I'll tell you a MCOB boat is a wind tunnel if you want to haul @ss, super annoying and the space in the Rage is used so well that storage is a weakness. Hope that helps.
I have a 2005 Rage and it's an amazing boat. Mine has wood but not a lot. I don't think the performance or quality would be very different between my boat and a brand new one with similar power (425 hp for my 496 HO). I'm super happy with my rage. With half tanks a fuel and a couple of folks I can run 70-75 without any stress with regard to stability. I spend a lot of time going 20 mph towing kids on a wakeboard or skiing. That's really why I went with the rage instead of the heat. Great manners around the dock. Here's the caveat... I've been in rough water a few times and the boat still feels very safe... Got in a bad situation in a big storm with my five kids and it was super solid but, in rougher water, the kind that is common in Havasu, I won't run hard. It's just to hard on the passengers and the boat. In the next few years I'll be moving to a closed bow and the Heat and the Bullet are in consideration because I want to go to bigger water and have a cabin for the occasional overnight. I'll tell you a MCOB boat is a wind tunnel if you want to haul @ss, super annoying and the space in the Rage is used so well that storage is a weakness. Hope that helps.
I have a the same boat but a 2001, how are you getting 75mph? I have not seen over 71 and that is near empty and in December. Prop?
Stand corrected, older Rages had 20*. BTW the ad you posted says 22.5* deadrise in the specifications!s
Both boats have 22.5 * deadrise with 15* transom angles.
As far as the cabin bench size goes the port side has room for three smaller folks or two comfortably and two or one comfortably on the starboard side with a cooler bay designed for the Coleman mid-sized stainless steel cooler. Unfortunately there is no cabin door and I haven't seen any one fashioned out of vinyl that I think would actually work. I think the Rage would be very comfortable on a perfect to light chop day. Anything beyond that and you'd be punishing the boat and your passengers. I think the Nordics are holding value very well. My 2005 NADA's for 32-35k.
I don't believe they ever changed the bottom on the rages. I'm not sure which deadrise is correct. The bullet rides smoother then the rages, but they rages are crazy fast with even an HO.
Rage will do low 70's with a 496mag HO and a bravo 1 24p prop, I hear 75-76 with a 26p. My Rage will do 69 at will, and 71 is my best so far. I know nothing about the bullet.How much faster if they both had HOs?
How much faster if they both had HOs?
Rage will do low 70's with a 496mag HO and a bravo 1 24p prop, I hear 75-76 with a 26p. My Rage will do 69 at will, and 71 is my best so far. I know nothing about the bullet.
I've heard maybe 74 on this prop is reachable but I have yet to see it. I haven't heard of anyone getting upper 70's on a stock HO, mid yes. Would be very interested to see that.They are usually faster then that with a light load. Upper 70's
Rage will be 6-7 mph faster.
What I've read is both boats do about 74-75 but the Howard would only do 70 with an HO? I thought Howard had the fastest single engine v bottom? Love them both! Just wanna know the ins and outs!
If service after sale has anything to do with choice hands down I'd take the Nordic ,my buddy bought a used early 2000 ' s heat and the Nordic crew in Havasu take amazing care of him and half the time don't charge and if they do its next to nothing .There a bunch of great guys over there :thumbup:
Those are fast hulls I've got a 230 and don't get over 70 [emoji106]
You don't need to admit that, everything's 5 to 8 mph faster on the internet.![]()
Oh well in that case after the tune I'll be in the 80's [emoji2]
I wouldn't push it, but at least mid to hi 70's...![]()
Curious if any one has a new composite rage? How does it compare to a Howard 25 bullet? Ride, speed, cruddy ect... they look awesome.
So what makes the Bullet smoother than the Rage? How does the Rage handle?
I believe this is close to you...
http://www.captainsvillage.com/inventory/details.php?item=2014-nordic-rage-25
The bullet had a more aggressive entry then the Nordic and the keel at the mid ships is very aggressive. The angle is variable and gets shallower as it gets closer to the transom.
The Nordic runs the same degree vee from front to back.
That's why the Howard runs a little smoother. The Nordic has twice the room in it that the Howard does though. They feel very open and wide. The Nordic is also faster power for power.
It's all in what you are looking for in a boat.