Blackmagic94
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2017
- Messages
- 5,410
- Reaction score
- 7,446
What actually helps out more. Seems like the velocity stacks actually would work better
I would go with something like this tooNot sure on function, but I've used both and I prefer a Scoop for looks. Like this.
![]()
On that same note, looking at that pic, my OCD is kicking in full time!!
Just don't put one of those fake shotgun double barrel hilborn want to be scoops on it.
No actually Holley 4150 style velocity stack. I’ve seen them almost always ran on engine dyno. Just a nice big spun alum transition to the barrels. CP performance has some with built in stainless mesh screens as well
Scoop is more functional for debris getting in the carb, and there is no wind blowing in the dyno cell so velocity stack may not work the same in open air with wind blowing across it, as it does inside of an air box under a hood, or in the dyno cell.
Summit. comWhere can I get the tall fiberglass scoops. I’m not a fan of the metal ones, looks to much like a cheap mail box to me
Ya those air cleaners look like crap scoop looks goodNot sure on function, but I've used both and I prefer a Scoop for looks. Like this.
![]()
On that same note, looking at that pic, my OCD is kicking in full time!!
Ya those look like crap
The air cleaners look like crap scoop looks better
But you can’t see them scoop looks clean
But you can’t see them scoop looks clean![]()
None make a shit bit of difference unless you consider water intrusion, in which case anything looks stupid turning it around backwards to aid in the prevention of that.
I think folks don’t quite understand how much air an engine consumes. If it wants it, it’ll find it. A stupid scoop won’t help anything...unless it’s making a blower or turbos look prettier.
I know guys who have had to jet up after going from velocity stack to scoop. Probably doesn’t matter if your boat only goes 70 but 100+ might change that.
Don’t have a blower.Sorry but a blower with carbs just looks....eh... cheap, or incomplete. Like you're just running them until your bird/bug catcher hat arrives... As it is, the blower will pull a lot more than any air flow "induction aid" will push..Like was already said, MFI, Crower MFI, with the staggered stacks, (not with the blower), is the sexist piece you can put on a boat..
Ray
None make a shit bit of difference unless you consider water intrusion, in which case anything looks stupid turning it around backwards to aid in the prevention of that.
I think folks don’t quite understand how much air an engine consumes. If it wants it, it’ll find it. A stupid scoop won’t help anything...unless it’s making a blower or turbos look prettier.
I'll do the math tomorrow, but I'm pretty sure the difference in pressure in the amount of air packed into a 40 sq/in hole between 70 and 100mph considering ambient pressure is negligible considering what the engine is already drawing in..... and they were likely not jetted appropriately in the first place.
Velocity stacks do make a bit more power from what I’ve seen from dyno tests.
Scoop, but a squared off scoop. I like the one they ran on the Hot Rod Crusher Camaro.
View attachment 773171
Same car with stacks is a failure at life.
View attachment 773176
those valve covers suggest a lot, mostly change that tunnel ram out for a nice dual plane, single 850 cfm. carb. A veloctiy stack or scoop won't make a lick of difference perf. wise. The motor will likely run cleaner and actually make useable power. The fuel you save will help pay for parts to build a real engine that benefits from that t-ram. jmo......
those valve covers suggest a lot, mostly change that tunnel ram out for a nice dual plane, single 850 cfm. carb. A veloctiy stack or scoop won't make a lick of difference perf. wise. The motor will likely run cleaner and actually make useable power. The fuel you save will help pay for parts to build a real engine that benefits from that t-ram. jmo......
No no and no