brgrcru
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
- Messages
- 6,571
- Reaction score
- 13,424
Off his bong againWhat the fuck kinda statement is that ?
Usually when he tokes a big hit
He makes sense
Last edited:
Off his bong againWhat the fuck kinda statement is that ?
Would you support someone to lead you if they had been shown to bend the rules? Would you look up to them, champion them?
I assume you are referring to Trump. In which case my alternative was Kamala ? Yes I prefer the lesser of two evils . And actually I don't look up to anybody . I've been around long enough to know everybody sucks .Would you support someone to lead you if they had been shown to bend the rules? Would you look up to them, champion them?
Obviously I know the angle in which you are aiming. I'm fairly sure we all do. I may be a bit different. I trust no man on a television screen, and less than zero would be the way I'd describe my trust for politicians. None of them are saviors. Anyone who blindly follows a man should realize one cannot be judged on appearance or words, and actions may not have the effects intended, or be for the reasons shown.Would you support someone to lead you if they had been shown to bend the rules? Would you look up to them, champion them?
One can only imagine what words of mine he twisted up in his head.Lol listen to this weasel word bullshit![]()
X1000Obviously I know the angle in which you are aiming. I'm fairly sure we all do. I may be a bit different. I trust no man on a television screen, and less than zero would be the way I'd describe my trust for politicians. None of them are saviors. Anyone who blindly follows a man should realize one cannot be judged on appearance or words, and actions may not have the effects intended, or be for the reasons shown.
Isaiah 45:20
"Assemble yourselves and come; draw near together, ye that are escaped of the nations: they have no knowledge that set up the wood of their graven image, and pray unto a god that cannot save."
I hated the government in much the same way I hated school, or even certain unions. It took me some time to see it wasn't the group, it was individuals in the group. Some had made themselves comfortable either on the backs of others, or by degrading others.X1000
I might have a lot more hate towards the government though !
Would you support someone to lead you if they had been shown to bend the rules? Would you look up to them, champion them?
You are a better man then meI hated the government in much the same way I hated school, or even certain unions. It took me some time to see it wasn't the group, it was individuals in the group. Some had made themselves comfortable either on the backs of others, or by degrading others.
My hate is more focused now I guess. Very few people I'd use that term towards. Sure, there's a lot of people I may dislike, but they are easily ignored.
You are a better man then meI hated the government in much the same way I hated school, or even certain unions. It took me some time to see it wasn't the group, it was individuals in the group. Some had made themselves comfortable either on the backs of others, or by degrading others.
My hate is more focused now I guess. Very few people I'd use that term towards. Sure, there's a lot of people I may dislike, but they are easily ignored.
Hmm, I think I may have calmed down after leaving Cali...there was a few less things to put pressure on me.You are a better man then me
I can’t deviate from hating Dem politicians and voter base. I lump them all in the same category.
Destroying and the destruction of a once great state .
Maybe because I live in California
Seen there policies and and there is not one thing I agree with
In other words fuck those pos .
Ad they voted for another .25 sales tax increase . For homelessness. That went into
You are a better man then me
Living in California and seeing what these dem politicians and voter base have done
To this state
Brings out hate and anger
Have a good day
![]()
Hiring Accelerates in March Despite Tariff Hysteria, ADP Reports
Private-sector job growth accelerated in March, countering gloomy predictions that tariffs would slam the brakes on the labor market. | Economywww.breitbart.com
THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE. We have been assured repeatedly, even by some members here, that this will only end in certain destruction the entire U.S. population, starting with Trump voters of course.![]()
Hiring Accelerates in March Despite Tariff Hysteria, ADP Reports
Private-sector job growth accelerated in March, countering gloomy predictions that tariffs would slam the brakes on the labor market. | Economywww.breitbart.com
Nope, Higher tariffs require more workers as it is a very large increase in regulatory burden on businesses. Someone has to fill all that paperwork out, file those tax forms, and determine the value of each item and its appropriate new tax implemented by the government.THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE. We have been assured repeatedly, even by some members here, that this will only end in certain destruction the entire U.S. population, starting with Trump voters of course.![]()
In the last survey I saw, the majority of MAGA supporters believe foreign companies pay the tariffs and consumers do not.As I ponder these impending across the board tariffs, if you just look at it as a consumption tax, which it is as it will ultimately be paid by consumers, I’m on board with it as a way to cut the deficit. Not sure this is what his base was expecting, as it will be a one time hit to inflation.
This is a back door tax increase without saying so, but I’m cool with that. Now take a meat axe to spending and we may have something here.
Just don’t piss on my shoes and call it rain by saying “the foreign manufacturers will bear the cost.” I guess if that’s the only way to sell it, so be it.
they are usually more favorable to the conservatives on the second and third revision.LOL
Wait, what?
I thought all the job numbers were fake?
Now they are accurate?
As I ponder these impending across the board tariffs, if you just look at it as a consumption tax, which it is as it will ultimately be paid by consumers, I’m on board with it as a way to cut the deficit. Not sure this is what his base was expecting, as it will be a one time hit to inflation.
This is a back door tax increase without saying so, but I’m cool with that. Now take a meat axe to spending and we may have something here.
Just don’t piss on my shoes and call it rain by saying “the foreign manufacturers will bear the cost.” I guess if that’s the only way to sell it, so be it.
Yes.. yes of course. Us good ol' Trump supporters are just too small minded to understand that tariff's would trickle down to the customers buying the product. I mean, that really is some higher level shit right there.In the last survey I saw, the majority of MAGA supporters believe foreign companies pay the tariffs and consumers do not.
So the President is just giving his base what they believe. Pretty smart on his part.
On board with the substance of his main policy items, and have said so. As a fiscal conservative and social moderate, pretty sure I’m with the majority of voters. No need to argue, as I’ve thought more about the tariffs, WHICH IS the title of this thread, sounds like a pretty good idea, especially if reciprocal.Yes.. yes of course. Us good ol' Trump supporters are just too small minded to understand that tariff's would trickle down to the customers buying the product. I mean, that really is some higher level shit right there.
I will still vote for Trump 7 days a week, 365 days a year, rather than Open Borders, Men in Women's Sports, Transgender studies funded world wide by my tax dollars, having to hear the White Man is the root of all evil everyday, or having Killary, FJB, or Heels up Harris in office.
Can either of you say the same? Be honest.
You say you are on board while still taking shots at Trump supporters. Kind of odd right?On board with the substance of his main policy items, and have said so. As a fiscal conservative and social moderate, pretty sure I’m with the majority of voters. No need to argue, as I’ve thought more about the tariffs, WHICH IS the title of this thread, sounds like a pretty good idea, especially if reciprocal.
From my history reading, Tommy has produced the text from 530, so its out there. Tommy has asked to see the text he is accused of typing and sending. Never been produced. In fact if memory serves he offered $1000.00 to see it.
Maybe DM Tommy see what he says?
Nope, Higher tariffs require more workers as it is a very large increase in regulatory burden on businesses. Someone has to fill all that paperwork out, file those tax forms, and determine the value of each item and its appropriate new tax implemented by the government.
What you have been assured is that it will result in higher prices, higher prices naturally means higher total GDP as GDP is the sum of all transactions.
Under these tax increases, you can actually have an increase in total GDP while volumes of goods sold measured in units falls.
Like in all economic statistics, people will pick the one that best supports their religion.
Well because there isn’t a tariff in place now.Huh, if a tariff was already in place, why would it require more workers just because it is higher. The same work exists.
You may have to change it once in your system for multiple products, but you don't need 1000 more employees because of it. If you don't have a computer system that carries it for you, again nothing changes - The paperwork still exists. I can go in and change numbers to populate within a few minutes across the board if necessary and I would think a majority of businesses in the US can do the same.
Most companies have a CFO in charge of accounting and tax filings - Now you need another? The work remains the same - You have to file them anyway......
I enjoy discussing the substance of politics in a dispassionate manner, without insulting members of our little off road enthusiast fraternity here. This forum certainly tilts to the far right and I like to add a more moderate view at times. Don’t knowingly take shots at anyone, that’s not my thing.You say you are on board while still taking shots at Trump supporters. Kind of odd right?
I thought you said you just added a line item to your invoice?Nope, Higher tariffs require more workers as it is a very large increase in regulatory burden on businesses. Someone has to fill all that paperwork out, file those tax forms, and determine the value of each item and its appropriate new tax implemented by the government.
What you have been assured is that it will result in higher prices, higher prices naturally means higher total GDP as GDP is the sum of all transactions.
Under these tax increases, you can actually have an increase in total GDP while volumes of goods sold measured in units falls.
Like in all economic statistics, people will pick the one that best supports their religion.
That’s when selling.I thought you said you just added a line item to your invoice?
Tariff 25%
All good with me.I enjoy discussing the substance of politics in a dispassionate manner, without insulting members of our little off road enthusiast fraternity here. This forum certainly tilts to the far right and I like to add a more moderate view at times. Don’t knowingly take shots at anyone, that’s not my thing.
Add another line item. Is this a trick question?That’s when selling.
What about now when importing.
Well because there isn’t a tariff in place now.
Again reading comprehension - I said if a Tariff already exists...
I also edited my post..
Unfortunately, compliance will be up to the government. They will create the systems and procedures, write rules and methodology for implementation and compliance, as well as create the rules, systems and staffing for the compliance audits of those who import goods. And then companies will figure out how to work that language in the most advantageous way possible. It is certainly good news for accountants and lawyers.Add another line item. Is this a trick question?
Is there any scenario where you can partially source or manufacture stateside as opposed to maintaining current avenues?America had very few tariffs in place prior to this, so there was little in the form of compliance. Now almost every single thing imported is now subject to a tariff. The implementation and systems necessary to comply with all that will also be interesting to see how it plays out. The big companies will certainly have the systems in place to scale, the little guy may struggle.
Existing inventory just went up in value so there is a windfall equal to the new tax enacted today. Sellers can collect the price increase without paying the tariff on existing in-country inventory. Those who built inventory can certainly bank that excess margin.
At the end of the day, it is what it is. Time to figure out how to take market share from your competitors as these types of expansion of government over capitalism creates opportunities.![]()
To be fair, Obama's supporters believed they could keep their doctor if they liked their doctorSo the President is just giving his base what they believe.
Supplier handles that shit....they get to add another line itemThat’s when selling.
What about now when importing.
Supplier handles that shit....they get to add another line item
What about something that goes across the border multiple times as value added processes get added to it. When is it tariffed, what value, each time, only at final crossing? And if it goes through multiple processes in multiple jurisdictions that now all have different tariffs? How about transfer pricing studies to value this item versus another item, in this subsidiary versus another subsidiary. What are the income tax consequences in each jurisdiction I do business in with all these new tariffs?Examples of how stupid this can get;
- So you get to see your supplier's profit margin as suggested above? ... unless the supplier charges the tariff on their selling price and pockets the tariff on profit.
- They can come up with a 'blended tariff' percentage on everything they supply and add it to every invoice.
I'm waiting to hear, "Just think about the children!"Lol the amount of strawmanning in this thread is more than a liberal accusing a conservative of being a racist![]()
Maybe we can put them to work in a new US plant.I'm waiting to hear, "Just think about the children!"
Yore the one always complaining about a lack of available skilled labor....Maybe we can put them to work in a new US plant.![]()
The small hands are best for micro electronics.Yore the one always complaining about a lack of available skilled labor....
The small hands are best for micro electronics.![]()
I'm good with that. So do you believe Trump is making up his statements regarding the U.S.A. subsidizing Canada? How about we stop all subsidizing across the board, either benefiting Canada or the U.S.A. Like you said, just shut it all down.
I like it. Shut down the borders and fend for yourself.Trump is full of shit on this one, our economies are so intertwined that there is no simple way to separate them. Buying more stuff isn't a subsidy just as telling partial truths isn't the whole truth.
Yes, close the border tight, all the lies and bullshit will rise to the top real quick.... on both sides of the line
I think Trump needs to give a speech supporting all the Libturd talking points and see how fast their heads explode.Liberals love taxes
Liberals say the tariffs are taxes
Liberals now say they hate tariffs? WTF?
Liberals don’t really hate tariffs.
Liberals really just hate Trump.
Businessman says capitalism is about making profits.
Businessman says he’ll make more profit if tariffs are implemented
Businessman says he hates tariffs? WTF?
Businessman doesn’t really hate tariffs.
Businessman really just hates Trump.
Trade or Invade.I like it. Shut down the borders and fend for yourself.
I can think of many examples, but I'm not a logistics or finance expert.Is there any scenario where you can partially source or manufacture stateside as opposed to maintaining current avenues?
The WIP and the raw is also subject to tariffs. Absent full US vertical integration from mining to semiconductor manufacturing tariffs apply.I can think of many examples, but I'm not a logistics or finance expert.
Seems advantages to ship raw material or WIP across and final assemble in the US as opposed to shipping finished goods.
I'm also guess bootlegging might become popular again in the great lakes region.
I second this. Canada would be crying uncle within 24 hours.I like it. Shut down the borders and fend for yourself.
Well, they were talking all kinds of tough yesterday. We'll see how it plays out.I second this. Canada would be crying uncle within 24 hours.
You would be walking to work in 3 daysI second this. Canada would be crying uncle within 24 hours.