WELCOME TO RIVER DAVES PLACE

SCUFF OR SPEED COAT????

2FORCEFULL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2008
Messages
28,989
Reaction score
17,745
WHATS BETTER ,,, to just sand the bottom and leave it or speed coat???


and also who does it now??
 

rivergames

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2008
Messages
16,324
Reaction score
15,074
WHATS BETTER ,,, to just sand the bottom and leave it or speed coat???


and also who does it now??

Rolling or spraying a speed coat is as easy as it gets. Just buy a can, rough up the bottom of the boat, and roll it on.

I really want to try the new golf ball texture on a boat. Seams like that would be the best way to go
 

WTMFA

Kill Em All
Joined
Dec 30, 2007
Messages
2,863
Reaction score
452
Rolling or spraying a speed coat is as easy as it gets. Just buy a can, rough up the bottom of the boat, and roll it on.

I really want to try the new golf ball texture on a boat. Seams like that would be the best way to go

Can't believe builders haven't tried this yet, you would think it would pay off in sales if boat ran better than others
 

NdaWind

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2008
Messages
1,796
Reaction score
147
Tried the golf ball texture on sailplanes with no noticeable difference it was however a bitch to clean
 

Sharp Shooter

The "anti-yuppie"
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
7,866
Reaction score
21,243
WHATS BETTER ,,, to just sand the bottom and leave it or speed coat???


and also who does it now??

Based on the info from world record setting teams I skipped the speed coat on my Biesemeyer. I still use the graphite for spraying underwater gear, but thats it.
 

RiverDave

In it to win it
Joined
Sep 13, 2007
Messages
127,339
Reaction score
168,586
The only thing speed coat is good for is after you blue print the bottom of a boat it's exponentially cheaper to apply that, then to regel / buff the bottom of the boat..

If the boat is gelled and in good shape, and straight, I wouldn't mess with it at all.. If you got any improvements out of scuffing it or speed coating it I'd be shocked.

RD
 

j540

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2008
Messages
235
Reaction score
14
Buffed or polished bottom has more drag than a 120/220 grit bottom with graphite or dark gray primer / Speed coat, Or as Cole use to say
" COLE-Glide" :D:D.
 

Rexone

an ordinary American
Joined
Sep 19, 2007
Messages
3,366
Reaction score
424
I had a conversation not too long ago with Rankin on this subject and he said its worth 2-3 mph in his testing on the SS80. So I guess it depends on if you want every last mph and I'm sure it also depends on the efficiency of your particular boat. A lot of guys use it (racers) as it is a steady seller over the years. For recreational boat probably not worth the bother. We also have used it historically on racing skis, roughed just a bit with good success. It makes a difference in the slip and ride of the ski (effort). But ask 10 people about speed coat and you'll likely get 10 answers that don't match. :D
 
Last edited:

white tortilla

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
1,668
Reaction score
3,926
Rolling or spraying a speed coat is as easy as it gets. Just buy a can, rough up the bottom of the boat, and roll it on.

I really want to try the new golf ball texture on a boat. Seams like that would be the best way to go

ive heard from a reliable source that tried this on a superstock and supposedly it slowed it down.
 

Sharp Shooter

The "anti-yuppie"
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
7,866
Reaction score
21,243
I had a conversation not too long ago with Rankin on this subject and he said its worth 2-3 mph in his testing on the SS80. So I guess it depends on if you want every last mph and I'm sure it also depends on the efficiency of your particular boat. A lot of guys use it (racers) as it is a steady seller over the years. For recreational boat probably not worth the bother. We also have used it historically on racing skis, roughed just a bit with good success. It makes a difference in the slip and ride of the ski (effort). But ask 10 people about speed coat and you'll likely get 10 answers that don't match. :D

I went with the same finish that Lance Faulkner, Larry Hamilton and Rankin were doing back when Lance set the SS records.
The only difference is I probably won't ever apply the $kiss coat$. :cool:
 

harlanorrin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2009
Messages
180
Reaction score
9
Is anyone going to try FISH SCALES, AGAIN?????????????????
HARLAN ORRIN
 

2FORCEFULL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2008
Messages
28,989
Reaction score
17,745
I had a conversation not too long ago with Rankin on this subject and he said its worth 2-3 mph in his testing on the SS80. So I guess it depends on if you want every last mph and I'm sure it also depends on the efficiency of your particular boat. A lot of guys use it (racers) as it is a steady seller over the years. For recreational boat probably not worth the bother. We also have used it historically on racing skis, roughed just a bit with good success. It makes a difference in the slip and ride of the ski (effort). But ask 10 people about speed coat and you'll likely get 10 answers that don't match. :D

the hallett straight bottom runs on a lot of wet surface... you feel the drag in the throttles...

I had one that I did the bottom with 120 grit.. wasn't all just for top end,it made the prop slip numbers better..
 

rvrrun

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 15, 2015
Messages
6,515
Reaction score
7,385
Rolling or spraying a speed coat is as easy as it gets. Just buy a can, rough up the bottom of the boat, and roll it on.

I really want to try the new golf ball texture on a boat. Seams like that would be the best way to go

I used to test golf balls on the flow bench, there's science in them dimples.
 

shan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2007
Messages
758
Reaction score
992
The golf ball dimples are all about lift and have nothing to do with reduced drag.
 

dryhoze1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2011
Messages
781
Reaction score
1,606
that is entirely untrue.

Id have to agree..


While I'm sure the dimples provide some lift, my piloting experience tells me it does reduce drag. Especially on the back side. Thus providing a longer drive.

On a side note, I rolled my speedcoat on the bottom with a heavy nap roller. Came out awesome :thumbup:

FYI- for those considering. Tractor supply stores sell a black graphite paint. I have used this with great results & 1\4 the price.


Here ya go ~
http://www.tractorsupply.com/tsc/product/ez-slide-graphite-based-coating-1-qt?cm_vc=-10005
 

shan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2007
Messages
758
Reaction score
992
that is entirely untrue.
I probably could/should have worded that differently, they do reduce drag, but they provide a significant amount of lift. I would not put dimples on the bottom of my boat.
 

rvrrun

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 15, 2015
Messages
6,515
Reaction score
7,385
I probably could/should have worded that differently, they do reduce drag, but they provide a significant amount of lift. I would not put dimples on the bottom of my boat.


They provide a significant amount of both. Spheres and cylinders are uniquely suited to dimples. Planar surfaces (like a wing or boat hull) are subject to skin friction drag instead of pressure drag like the golf ball. The dimples create a more turbulent boundary layer which causes a low pressure area behind the ball.
 

shan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2007
Messages
758
Reaction score
992
They provide a significant amount of both. Spheres and cylinders are uniquely suited to dimples. Planar surfaces (like a wing or boat hull) are subject to skin friction drag instead of pressure drag like the golf ball. The dimples create a more turbulent boundary layer which causes a low pressure area behind the ball.

The point is to not create a low pressure behind the ball, it already exists with the smooth sphere. That's what creates the drag - the pressure difference between the front and the rear of the ball. The dimples and the resultant turbulent flow reduces the wake and the low pressure (magnitude, relative to stagnant pressure) behind the ball.

The theory behind all of this has absolutely zero application to the bottom of a boat, and I hate golf.:)
 

rvrrun

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 15, 2015
Messages
6,515
Reaction score
7,385
Now I screwed up, I meant reduce low pressure.

We did tons of flow bench and dyno testing with dimples on intake/exhaust valves, in the combustion chamber and on the short side radius of the intake port. These changes showed little improvement on the flow bench, but there were gains on the dyno. Maybe something akin to a vortex generator would work on a boat hull.
 

Carlson-jet

Not Giving A Fuck Is An Art
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
7,785
Reaction score
7,950
Speed coat works great on the lawn mower deck. I like Ardies thought on it's way easier/cheaper on a fresh blueprinted bottom. :thumbsup I hadn't thought of that. I would have re gelled and then coated. Years ago when Papp flew out and blue printed my friends Young Blood 19' This must have been the process as I don't recall hearing about it being re jelled.
 

nrbr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2013
Messages
1,418
Reaction score
921
Cool thread! Tried golf ball finish and it slowed boat down considerably. Best numbers we got were from gelcoat sanded directionaly and waxed with kiss kote
 

Sharp Shooter

The "anti-yuppie"
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
7,866
Reaction score
21,243
Cool thread! Tried golf ball finish and it slowed boat down considerably. Best numbers we got were from gelcoat sanded directionaly and waxed with kiss kote

Exactly why I went that direction. Plus, the graphite eventually rubs off where the bunks support the bottom. Thanks for the post streaker. :thumbsup
 
Top